Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Jones_v._Harris_Associates> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 38 of
38
with 100 items per page.
- Jones_v._Harris_Associates abstract "Jones v. Harris Associates L.P., 08-586 (2010), is a case heard by the United States Supreme Court on November 2, 2009 in which investors claimed that the fees they paid to an investment advisor were too steep, violating the Investment Company Act of 1940.The case held that the court has the jurisdiction to regulate fees of investment advisers in the mutual fund industry under the Investment Company Act of 1940, when those fees are excessive, and in breach of fiduciary duty. It is notable from a law and economics perspective for the vigorous opinion in the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeal of Judge Frank Easterbrook and the powerful dissent of Richard Posner, regarding the necessity and market failure in respect of adviser fee regulation.".
- Jones_v._Harris_Associates thumbnail JudgeEasterbrook.JPG?width=300.
- Jones_v._Harris_Associates wikiPageExternalLink index.php?title=Jones_v._Harris_Associates.
- Jones_v._Harris_Associates wikiPageID "24942268".
- Jones_v._Harris_Associates wikiPageRevisionID "591942090".
- Jones_v._Harris_Associates arguedate "--11-02".
- Jones_v._Harris_Associates argueyear "2009".
- Jones_v._Harris_Associates concurrence "Thomas".
- Jones_v._Harris_Associates decidedate "--03-30".
- Jones_v._Harris_Associates decideyear "2010".
- Jones_v._Harris_Associates docket "8".
- Jones_v._Harris_Associates fullname "Jerry N. Jones, et al., Petitioners v. Harris Associates L.P.".
- Jones_v._Harris_Associates hasPhotoCollection Jones_v._Harris_Associates.
- Jones_v._Harris_Associates holding "For a claim to be valid under the Investment Company Act fees must be disproportionately large that they cannot be related to the services rendered, Seventh Circuit reversed.".
- Jones_v._Harris_Associates joinmajority "unanimous".
- Jones_v._Harris_Associates lawsapplied "Section 36 of the Investment Company Act of 1940".
- Jones_v._Harris_Associates majority "Alito".
- Jones_v._Harris_Associates parallelcitations "172800.0".
- Jones_v._Harris_Associates prior "On writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit".
- Jones_v._Harris_Associates scotus "2009".
- Jones_v._Harris_Associates uspage "___".
- Jones_v._Harris_Associates usvol "559".
- Jones_v._Harris_Associates subject Category:2009_in_United_States_case_law.
- Jones_v._Harris_Associates subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Jones_v._Harris_Associates type Case.
- Jones_v._Harris_Associates type LegalCase.
- Jones_v._Harris_Associates type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Jones_v._Harris_Associates type UnitOfWork.
- Jones_v._Harris_Associates type Situation.
- Jones_v._Harris_Associates comment "Jones v. Harris Associates L.P., 08-586 (2010), is a case heard by the United States Supreme Court on November 2, 2009 in which investors claimed that the fees they paid to an investment advisor were too steep, violating the Investment Company Act of 1940.The case held that the court has the jurisdiction to regulate fees of investment advisers in the mutual fund industry under the Investment Company Act of 1940, when those fees are excessive, and in breach of fiduciary duty.".
- Jones_v._Harris_Associates label "Jones v. Harris Associates".
- Jones_v._Harris_Associates sameAs m.09gj5pt.
- Jones_v._Harris_Associates sameAs Q16851522.
- Jones_v._Harris_Associates sameAs Q16851522.
- Jones_v._Harris_Associates wasDerivedFrom Jones_v._Harris_Associates?oldid=591942090.
- Jones_v._Harris_Associates depiction JudgeEasterbrook.JPG.
- Jones_v._Harris_Associates isPrimaryTopicOf Jones_v._Harris_Associates.
- Jones_v._Harris_Associates name "Jerry N. Jones, et al., Petitioners v. Harris Associates L.P.".