Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Landmark_National_Bank_v._Kesler> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 27 of
27
with 100 items per page.
- Landmark_National_Bank_v._Kesler abstract "On August 28, 2009, the Kansas Supreme Court issued a ruling regarding the standing, rights and interests of Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems (MERS) in Landmark Nat’l Bank v. Kesler, 2009 Kan. LEXIS 834 (Aug 28, 2009). The court held that all indispensable parties must be identified and that the actual lender identified in foreclosure actions to protect each party's rights. The decision also addressed the role MERS plays in clouding the ownership of the promissory note and title to the property.In Landmark Nat’l Bank v. Kesler, MERS, the appellant sought to invoke due process rights which it said were violated when MERS failed to get notice of the fact that their “interest” was being wiped out via a prior foreclosure it did not receive notice of. The Court said simply that MERS — or any nominee” didn’t have any interest and proves its point by reference to simple statements in the documents and the simplest of laws and interpretation of the role of MERS and the requirements of recordation. The splitting or bifurcation of the promissory note or mortgage note and mortgage or deed of trust creates an immediate and fatal flaw in title.The Kansas Supreme Court went on to cite several other case across the nation and stated: “When the role of a servicing agent [MERS] acting on behalf of a mortgagee is thrown into the mix, it is no wonder that it is often difficult for unsophisticated borrowers to be certain of the identity of their lenders and mortgagees.” In re Schwartz, 366 B.R. 265, 266 (Bankr. D. Mass. 2007) and then cited the Supreme Court of New York (Kings County) that said: “[T]he practices of the various MERS members, including both [the original lender] and [the mortgage purchaser], in obscuring from the public the actual ownership of a mortgage, thereby creating the opportunity for substantial abuses and prejudice to mortgagors . . . , should not be permitted to insulate [the mortgage purchaser] from the consequences of its actions in accepting a mortgage from [the original lender] that was already the subject of litigation in which [the original lender] erroneously represented that it had authority to act as mortgagee.” Johnson, 2008 WL 4182397, at *4, 873 N.Y.S.2d 234 (2008).".
- Landmark_National_Bank_v._Kesler wikiPageID "24456273".
- Landmark_National_Bank_v._Kesler wikiPageRevisionID "560730349".
- Landmark_National_Bank_v._Kesler hasPhotoCollection Landmark_National_Bank_v._Kesler.
- Landmark_National_Bank_v._Kesler subject Category:2009_in_Kansas.
- Landmark_National_Bank_v._Kesler subject Category:2009_in_United_States_case_law.
- Landmark_National_Bank_v._Kesler subject Category:Kansas_state_case_law.
- Landmark_National_Bank_v._Kesler subject Category:United_States_housing_bubble.
- Landmark_National_Bank_v._Kesler type AdministrativeDistrict108491826.
- Landmark_National_Bank_v._Kesler type Country108544813.
- Landmark_National_Bank_v._Kesler type District108552138.
- Landmark_National_Bank_v._Kesler type Location100027167.
- Landmark_National_Bank_v._Kesler type Object100002684.
- Landmark_National_Bank_v._Kesler type PhysicalEntity100001930.
- Landmark_National_Bank_v._Kesler type Region108630985.
- Landmark_National_Bank_v._Kesler type UnitedStatesHousingBubble.
- Landmark_National_Bank_v._Kesler type YagoGeoEntity.
- Landmark_National_Bank_v._Kesler type YagoLegalActorGeo.
- Landmark_National_Bank_v._Kesler type YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity.
- Landmark_National_Bank_v._Kesler comment "On August 28, 2009, the Kansas Supreme Court issued a ruling regarding the standing, rights and interests of Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems (MERS) in Landmark Nat’l Bank v. Kesler, 2009 Kan. LEXIS 834 (Aug 28, 2009). The court held that all indispensable parties must be identified and that the actual lender identified in foreclosure actions to protect each party's rights.".
- Landmark_National_Bank_v._Kesler label "Landmark National Bank v. Kesler".
- Landmark_National_Bank_v._Kesler sameAs m.080jx3t.
- Landmark_National_Bank_v._Kesler sameAs Q16959795.
- Landmark_National_Bank_v._Kesler sameAs Q16959795.
- Landmark_National_Bank_v._Kesler sameAs Landmark_National_Bank_v._Kesler.
- Landmark_National_Bank_v._Kesler wasDerivedFrom Landmark_National_Bank_v._Kesler?oldid=560730349.
- Landmark_National_Bank_v._Kesler isPrimaryTopicOf Landmark_National_Bank_v._Kesler.