Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 74 of
74
with 100 items per page.
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components abstract "Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc., is an American legal case involving the computer printer company Lexmark, which had designed an authentication system using a microcontroller so that only authorized toner cartridges could be used. The resulting litigation (described by Justice Scalia in 2014 as "sprawling", and by others as having the potential to go on as long as Jarndyce v. Jarndyce) has resulted in significant decisions affecting United States intellectual property and trademark law.In separate rulings in 2004 and 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled that: circumvention of Lexmark's ink cartridge authentication does not violate the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), and Static Control Components had standing basis under the Lanham Act to sue Lexmark for false advertising in relation to its promotion of the program, which was unanimously affirmed in 2014 by the Supreme Court of the United States.The Supreme Court's 2014 ruling also affects statutory interpretation in the area of standing in pursuing lawsuits on statutory grounds in a wide variety of areas in federal court.".
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components wikiPageExternalLink 20050221-4636.html.
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components wikiPageExternalLink In%20FCO%2020120829127.
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components wikiPageExternalLink argument.
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components wikiPageExternalLink rulesofthecourt.pdf.
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components wikiPageExternalLink 387.F3d.522.03-5400.html.
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components wikiPageID "6333492".
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components wikiPageRevisionID "606220417".
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components appealedTo Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States.
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components arguedate "--12-03".
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components argueyear "2013".
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components case "Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc., No. 03-5400".
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components case "Static Control Components, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc., Nos. 09–6287, 09–6288, 09–6449".
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components citations "25920.0".
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components court United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Sixth_Circuit.
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components dateDecided "2004-10-26".
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components dateDecided "2012-08-29".
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components decidedate "--03-25".
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components decideyear "2014".
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components decisionBy Karen_Nelson_Moore.
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components docket "12".
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components findlaw "http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-6th-circuit/1211276.html".
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components findlaw "http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-6th-circuit/1610931.html".
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components fullName "Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.".
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components fullName "Static Control Components, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc.".
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components fullname "Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.".
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components hasPhotoCollection Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components.
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components holding "Judgment AFFIRMED. Static Control's alleged injurieslost sales and damage to its business reputationfall within the zone of interests protected by the Lanham Act, and Static Control sufficiently alleged that its injuries were proximately caused by Lexmark's misrepresentations.".
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components judges "Damon Keith, Danny Julian Boggs, and Karen Nelson Moore".
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components judges "Gilbert Stroud Merritt, Jr., Jeffrey S. Sutton, and John Feikens".
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components litigants "Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.".
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components majority "Justice Scalia, for a unanimous court".
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components name "Lexmark Int'l v. Static Control Components".
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components name "Static Control Components v. Lexmark Intern., Inc.".
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components opinions "District court erroneously granted summary judgment for plaintiff on claim under Digital Millennium Copyright Act based on defendant's manufacture of computer chips that enabled third party manufacturers to produce toner cartridges that were compatible with laser printers manufactured by plaintiff".
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components opinions "Static Control Components lacked standing to pursue a federal antitrust claim under the Clayton Act or the Sherman Act, but could pursue a false association claim under the Lanham Act, as different tests for standing applied.".
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components oralargument argument.
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components otherSource "leagle.com".
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components otherSource "openjurist.org".
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components otherSource "resource.org".
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components otherUrl "http://openjurist.org/387/f3d/522/lexmark-international-inc-v-static-control-components-inc".
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components otherUrl In%20FCO%2020120829127.
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components otherUrl 387.F3d.522.03-5400.html.
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components prior "25920.0".
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components priorActions "172800.0".
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components priorActions "2006".
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components scotus "2010".
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components subsequentActions "Rehearing denied en banc, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 23975".
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components subsequentActions "rehearing denied, Dec. 29, 2004; and rehearing en banc denied, Feb. 15, 2005; case remanded to district court for further proceedings consistent with the opinion.".
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components uspage "___".
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components usvol "572".
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components subject Category:2004_in_United_States_case_law.
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components subject Category:2012_in_United_States_case_law.
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components subject Category:2014_in_United_States_case_law.
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components subject Category:Digital_Millennium_Copyright_Act_case_law.
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components subject Category:False_advertising_law.
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components subject Category:Lexmark.
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components subject Category:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Sixth_Circuit_cases.
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components subject Category:United_States_competition_law.
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components subject Category:United_States_copyright_case_law.
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components type Case.
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components type LegalCase.
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components type UnitOfWork.
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components type Situation.
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components comment "Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc., is an American legal case involving the computer printer company Lexmark, which had designed an authentication system using a microcontroller so that only authorized toner cartridges could be used. The resulting litigation (described by Justice Scalia in 2014 as "sprawling", and by others as having the potential to go on as long as Jarndyce v.".
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components label "Lexmark Int'l v. Static Control Components".
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components sameAs m.0g1hq0.
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components sameAs Q6537898.
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components sameAs Q6537898.
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components wasDerivedFrom Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components?oldid=606220417.
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components isPrimaryTopicOf Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components.
- Lexmark_Int'l_v._Static_Control_Components name "Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.".