Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Loop_v._Litchfield> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 19 of
19
with 100 items per page.
- Loop_v._Litchfield abstract "Loop v. Litchfield 42 N. Y. 351 (1870) was a part of the historic line of cases holding that the privity requirement barred a products liability action unless the product in question was "inherently dangerous."".
- Loop_v._Litchfield wikiPageExternalLink PPA91,M1.
- Loop_v._Litchfield wikiPageExternalLink PPA112,M1.
- Loop_v._Litchfield wikiPageExternalLink PPA58,M1.
- Loop_v._Litchfield wikiPageID "23460149".
- Loop_v._Litchfield wikiPageRevisionID "594568522".
- Loop_v._Litchfield hasPhotoCollection Loop_v._Litchfield.
- Loop_v._Litchfield subject Category:1870_in_United_States_case_law.
- Loop_v._Litchfield subject Category:New_York_state_case_law.
- Loop_v._Litchfield subject Category:Product_liability_case_law.
- Loop_v._Litchfield subject Category:United_States_contract_case_law.
- Loop_v._Litchfield subject Category:United_States_tort_case_law.
- Loop_v._Litchfield comment "Loop v. Litchfield 42 N. Y. 351 (1870) was a part of the historic line of cases holding that the privity requirement barred a products liability action unless the product in question was "inherently dangerous."".
- Loop_v._Litchfield label "Loop v. Litchfield".
- Loop_v._Litchfield sameAs m.0640x2v.
- Loop_v._Litchfield sameAs Q6675867.
- Loop_v._Litchfield sameAs Q6675867.
- Loop_v._Litchfield wasDerivedFrom Loop_v._Litchfield?oldid=594568522.
- Loop_v._Litchfield isPrimaryTopicOf Loop_v._Litchfield.