Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Mobile_v._Bolden> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 45 of
45
with 100 items per page.
- Mobile_v._Bolden abstract "Mobile v. Bolden, 446 U.S. 55 (1980), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that electoral districts must be drawn without racially discriminatory intent to warrant constitutional protection. In Gomillion v. Lightfoot, the court had held that creating electoral districts which disenfranchised blacks violated the Fifteenth Amendment, but it did not as readily distinguish between effect and intent as it would in Mobile.".
- Mobile_v._Bolden wikiPageID "4793256".
- Mobile_v._Bolden wikiPageRevisionID "580618236".
- Mobile_v._Bolden arguedate "--03-19".
- Mobile_v._Bolden argueyear "1979".
- Mobile_v._Bolden citation "172800.0".
- Mobile_v._Bolden concurrence "Blackmun".
- Mobile_v._Bolden concurrence "Stevens".
- Mobile_v._Bolden decidedate "--04-22".
- Mobile_v._Bolden decideyear "1980".
- Mobile_v._Bolden dissent "Brennan".
- Mobile_v._Bolden dissent "Marshall".
- Mobile_v._Bolden dissent "White".
- Mobile_v._Bolden fullname "City of Mobile, Alabama, et al. v. Bolden, et al.".
- Mobile_v._Bolden hasPhotoCollection Mobile_v._Bolden.
- Mobile_v._Bolden holding "Facially neutral electoral districting is constitutional, even if the at-large elections dilute the voting strength of black citizens.".
- Mobile_v._Bolden joinplurality "Burger, Powell, Rehnquist".
- Mobile_v._Bolden lawsapplied "U.S. Const. amends. XIV, XV; 79 Stat. 437, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 1973".
- Mobile_v._Bolden litigants "Mobile v. Bolden".
- Mobile_v._Bolden plurality "Stewart".
- Mobile_v._Bolden prior "17280.0".
- Mobile_v._Bolden rearguedate "--10-29".
- Mobile_v._Bolden reargueyear "1979".
- Mobile_v._Bolden scotus "1975".
- Mobile_v._Bolden uspage "55".
- Mobile_v._Bolden usvol "446".
- Mobile_v._Bolden subject Category:1980_in_United_States_case_law.
- Mobile_v._Bolden subject Category:United_States_Fifteenth_Amendment_case_law.
- Mobile_v._Bolden subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Mobile_v._Bolden subject Category:United_States_electoral_redistricting_case_law.
- Mobile_v._Bolden subject Category:United_States_equal_protection_case_law.
- Mobile_v._Bolden type Case.
- Mobile_v._Bolden type LegalCase.
- Mobile_v._Bolden type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Mobile_v._Bolden type UnitOfWork.
- Mobile_v._Bolden type Event.
- Mobile_v._Bolden type Situation.
- Mobile_v._Bolden comment "Mobile v. Bolden, 446 U.S. 55 (1980), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that electoral districts must be drawn without racially discriminatory intent to warrant constitutional protection. In Gomillion v. Lightfoot, the court had held that creating electoral districts which disenfranchised blacks violated the Fifteenth Amendment, but it did not as readily distinguish between effect and intent as it would in Mobile.".
- Mobile_v._Bolden label "Mobile v. Bolden".
- Mobile_v._Bolden sameAs m.0cnlck.
- Mobile_v._Bolden sameAs Q6887254.
- Mobile_v._Bolden sameAs Q6887254.
- Mobile_v._Bolden wasDerivedFrom Mobile_v._Bolden?oldid=580618236.
- Mobile_v._Bolden isPrimaryTopicOf Mobile_v._Bolden.
- Mobile_v._Bolden name "City of Mobile, Alabama, et al. v. Bolden, et al.".