Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 37 of
37
with 100 items per page.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd abstract "Stone & Rolls Ltd v Moore Stephens [2009] UKHL 39 is a leading case relevant for UK company law and the law on fraud and ex turpi causa non oritur actio. The House of Lords decided by a majority of three to two that where the director and sole shareholder of a closely held private company deceived the auditors with fraud carried out on all creditors, subsequently the creditors of the insolvent company would be barred from suing the auditors for negligence from the shoes of the company. The Lords reasoned that where the company was only identifiable with one person, the fraud of that person would be attributable to the company, and the "company" (or the creditors standing in its insolvent shoes) could not rely on its own illegal fraud when bringing a claim for negligence against any auditors. It was the last case to be argued before the House of Lords.".
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd wikiPageExternalLink 1821.html.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd wikiPageExternalLink 39.html.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd wikiPageExternalLink www.moorestephens.co.uk.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd wikiPageID "24141331".
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd wikiPageRevisionID "603251849".
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd citations "[2009] UKHL 39, [2009] 1 AC 1391".
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd court House_of_Lords.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd dateDecided "2009-07-30".
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd decisionBy "Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood".
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd decisionBy "Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers".
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd decisionBy "Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe".
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd dissenting "Lord Mance".
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd dissenting "Lord Scott of Foscote".
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd fullName "Moore Stephens v Stone Rolls Ltd".
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd hasPhotoCollection Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd italicTitle "yes".
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd judges Jonathan_Mance,_Baron_Mance.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd judges Nicholas_Phillips,_Baron_Phillips_of_Worth_Matravers.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd judges Richard_Scott,_Baron_Scott_of_Foscote.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd judges Robert_Walker,_Baron_Walker_of_Gestingthorpe.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd judges Simon_Brown,_Baron_Brown_of_Eaton-under-Heywood.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd keywords "*fraud *illegality *attribution".
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd name "Stone & Rolls Ltd v Moore Stephens".
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd numberOfJudges "5".
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd priorActions ", setting aside".
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd subject Category:2009_in_case_law.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd subject Category:2009_in_the_United_Kingdom.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd subject Category:House_of_Lords_cases.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd subject Category:United_Kingdom_company_case_law.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd comment "Stone & Rolls Ltd v Moore Stephens [2009] UKHL 39 is a leading case relevant for UK company law and the law on fraud and ex turpi causa non oritur actio. The House of Lords decided by a majority of three to two that where the director and sole shareholder of a closely held private company deceived the auditors with fraud carried out on all creditors, subsequently the creditors of the insolvent company would be barred from suing the auditors for negligence from the shoes of the company.".
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd label "Moore Stephens v Stone Rolls Ltd".
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd sameAs m.07k759p.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd sameAs Q6908238.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd sameAs Q6908238.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd wasDerivedFrom Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd?oldid=603251849.
- Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd isPrimaryTopicOf Moore_Stephens_v_Stone_Rolls_Ltd.