Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Moral_equivalence> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 23 of
23
with 100 items per page.
- Moral_equivalence abstract "Moral equivalence is a term used in political debate, usually to criticize any denial that a moral hierarchy can be assessed of two sides in a conflict, or in the actions or tactics of two sides. The term originates from a 1906 address by William James entitled The Moral Equivalent of War, subsequently published in essay form in 1910.The term has some limited currency in polemic debates about the Cold War, and more currently, the Arab-Israeli conflict. "Moral equivalence" began to be used as a polemic term-of-retort to "moral relativism", which had been gaining use as an indictment against political foreign policy that appeared to use only a situation-based application of widely held ethical standards.The purveyors of the device usually start by believing their side is morally superior. They use history, possibly selectively, to cast the situation as a big-picture struggle against an evil power. This evil could be totalitarianism or genocidal policies or some other ostentatious villainy. They then justify the atrocities of their own side by claiming it to be a lesser evil compared with allowing the evil power to have its own way. These atrocities in this way become acts of good, not evil.International conflicts are sometimes viewed similarly, and interested parties periodically urge both sides to conduct a ceasefire and negotiate their differences. However these negotiations may prove difficult in that both parties in a conflict believe that they are morally superior to the other, and are unwilling to negotiate on basis of moral equivalence.".
- Moral_equivalence wikiPageExternalLink issue.asp?year=1986&month=01.
- Moral_equivalence wikiPageID "21056".
- Moral_equivalence wikiPageRevisionID "599113209".
- Moral_equivalence hasPhotoCollection Moral_equivalence.
- Moral_equivalence subject Category:Concepts_in_ethics.
- Moral_equivalence subject Category:Morality.
- Moral_equivalence subject Category:Political_terminology.
- Moral_equivalence type Abstraction100002137.
- Moral_equivalence type Cognition100023271.
- Moral_equivalence type Concept105835747.
- Moral_equivalence type ConceptsInEthics.
- Moral_equivalence type Content105809192.
- Moral_equivalence type Idea105833840.
- Moral_equivalence type PsychologicalFeature100023100.
- Moral_equivalence comment "Moral equivalence is a term used in political debate, usually to criticize any denial that a moral hierarchy can be assessed of two sides in a conflict, or in the actions or tactics of two sides. The term originates from a 1906 address by William James entitled The Moral Equivalent of War, subsequently published in essay form in 1910.The term has some limited currency in polemic debates about the Cold War, and more currently, the Arab-Israeli conflict.".
- Moral_equivalence label "Moral equivalence".
- Moral_equivalence sameAs m.05944.
- Moral_equivalence sameAs Q3019768.
- Moral_equivalence sameAs Q3019768.
- Moral_equivalence sameAs Moral_equivalence.
- Moral_equivalence wasDerivedFrom Moral_equivalence?oldid=599113209.
- Moral_equivalence isPrimaryTopicOf Moral_equivalence.