Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Muller_v._Oregon> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 48 of
48
with 100 items per page.
- Muller_v._Oregon abstract "Muller v. Oregon, 208 U.S. 412 (1908), was a landmark decision in United States Supreme Court history, as it justifies both sex discrimination and usage of labor laws during the time period. The case upheld Oregon state restrictions on the working hours of women as justified by the special state interest in protecting women's health. The ruling had important implications for protective labor legislation. The case was decided a mere three years after Lochner v. New York, 198 U.S. 45 (1905), in which a New York law restricting the weekly working hours of bakers was invalidated.".
- Muller_v._Oregon wikiPageExternalLink 412.html.
- Muller_v._Oregon wikiPageExternalLink events_muller.html.
- Muller_v._Oregon wikiPageExternalLink 1907_107.
- Muller_v._Oregon wikiPageExternalLink Muller.
- Muller_v._Oregon wikiPageID "169649".
- Muller_v._Oregon wikiPageRevisionID "605552256".
- Muller_v._Oregon arguedate "--01-15".
- Muller_v._Oregon argueyear "1908".
- Muller_v._Oregon citation "28".
- Muller_v._Oregon decidedate "--02-24".
- Muller_v._Oregon decideyear "1908".
- Muller_v._Oregon fullname "Curt Muller, Plaintiff in Error v. The State of Oregon. Appellant's claim: Oregon's 1903 maximum hours law is unconstitutional.".
- Muller_v._Oregon hasPhotoCollection Muller_v._Oregon.
- Muller_v._Oregon holding "Oregon's limit on the working hours of women was constitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment, because it was justified by the strong state interest in protecting women's health. Supreme Court of Oregon affirmed.".
- Muller_v._Oregon joinmajority "unanimous".
- Muller_v._Oregon lawsapplied "U.S. Const. amend. XIV; 1903 Or. Laws p. 148".
- Muller_v._Oregon litigants "Muller v. Oregon".
- Muller_v._Oregon majority "Brewer".
- Muller_v._Oregon prior "Defendant convicted; affirmed, 85 P. 855".
- Muller_v._Oregon scotus "1906".
- Muller_v._Oregon subsequent "None".
- Muller_v._Oregon uspage "412".
- Muller_v._Oregon usvol "208".
- Muller_v._Oregon subject Category:1908_in_United_States_case_law.
- Muller_v._Oregon subject Category:History_of_women's_rights_in_the_United_States.
- Muller_v._Oregon subject Category:Laundry.
- Muller_v._Oregon subject Category:Legal_history_of_Oregon.
- Muller_v._Oregon subject Category:Louis_Brandeis.
- Muller_v._Oregon subject Category:Sexism.
- Muller_v._Oregon subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Muller_v._Oregon subject Category:United_States_labor_case_law.
- Muller_v._Oregon subject Category:United_States_substantive_due_process_case_law.
- Muller_v._Oregon subject Category:Working_time.
- Muller_v._Oregon type Case.
- Muller_v._Oregon type LegalCase.
- Muller_v._Oregon type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Muller_v._Oregon type UnitOfWork.
- Muller_v._Oregon type Event.
- Muller_v._Oregon type Situation.
- Muller_v._Oregon comment "Muller v. Oregon, 208 U.S. 412 (1908), was a landmark decision in United States Supreme Court history, as it justifies both sex discrimination and usage of labor laws during the time period. The case upheld Oregon state restrictions on the working hours of women as justified by the special state interest in protecting women's health. The ruling had important implications for protective labor legislation. The case was decided a mere three years after Lochner v. New York, 198 U.S.".
- Muller_v._Oregon label "Muller v. Oregon".
- Muller_v._Oregon sameAs m.016r1v.
- Muller_v._Oregon sameAs Q6934194.
- Muller_v._Oregon sameAs Q6934194.
- Muller_v._Oregon wasDerivedFrom Muller_v._Oregon?oldid=605552256.
- Muller_v._Oregon isPrimaryTopicOf Muller_v._Oregon.
- Muller_v._Oregon name "Curt Muller, Plaintiff in Error v. The State of Oregon. Appellant's claim: Oregon's 1903 maximum hours law is unconstitutional.".