Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 48 of
48
with 100 items per page.
- Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum abstract "Pleasant Grove City v. Summum, 555 U.S. 460 (2009), is a legal case in which the United States Supreme Court considered whether the municipality of Pleasant Grove, Utah, which allows privately donated monuments, including one of the Ten Commandments, to be displayed on public property, must also let the Summum church put up its own statue, similar in size to the one of the ten commandments. Some court-watchers, including the New York Times editorial board, believe the Court should rule that the United States Constitution does not allow government to favor one religion over another.Arguing for the petitioner (the City of Pleasant Grove) was Jay Alan Sekulow, chief counsel for the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ), and for the Summum, attorney Pamela Harris of the firm O’Melveny & Myers. The ACLJ was expected to argue that there should be a distinction between government speech and private speech and though the government should have the right to display the 10 Commandments, it should not have to endorse all private speech.".
- Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum wikiPageExternalLink na-monuments1.
- Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum wikiPageExternalLink 07-665.ZS.html.
- Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum wikiPageExternalLink 11sect.html?hp.
- Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum wikiPageExternalLink 2008_07_665.
- Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum wikiPageID "19689649".
- Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum wikiPageRevisionID "588117342".
- Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum arguedate "--11-12".
- Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum argueyear "2008".
- Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum case "Pleasant Grove City v. Summum, 555 U.S. 460".
- Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum concurrence "Breyer".
- Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum concurrence "Scalia".
- Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum concurrence "Souter".
- Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum concurrence "Stevens".
- Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum decidedate "--02-25".
- Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum decideyear "2009".
- Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum docket "7".
- Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum fullname "Pleasant Grove City, Utah, et al. v. Summum".
- Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum hasPhotoCollection Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum.
- Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum holding "A municipality's acceptance and acquisition of a privately funded permanent monument erected in a public park while refusing to accept other privately funded permanent memorials is a valid expression of governmental speech".
- Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum joinconcurrence "Ginsburg".
- Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum joinconcurrence "Thomas".
- Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum joinmajority "Roberts, Stevens, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer".
- Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum litigants "Pleasant Grove City v. Summum".
- Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum majority "Alito".
- Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum otherSource "Cornell University Law School".
- Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum otherUrl 07-665.ZS.html.
- Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum parallelcitations "172800.0".
- Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum scotus "2006".
- Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum uspage "460".
- Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum usvol "555".
- Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum subject Category:2009_in_United_States_case_law.
- Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum subject Category:United_States_Free_Speech_Clause_case_law.
- Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum type Case.
- Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum type LegalCase.
- Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum type UnitOfWork.
- Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum type Event.
- Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum type Situation.
- Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum comment "Pleasant Grove City v. Summum, 555 U.S. 460 (2009), is a legal case in which the United States Supreme Court considered whether the municipality of Pleasant Grove, Utah, which allows privately donated monuments, including one of the Ten Commandments, to be displayed on public property, must also let the Summum church put up its own statue, similar in size to the one of the ten commandments.".
- Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum label "Pleasant Grove City v. Summum".
- Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum sameAs m.04mzggh.
- Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum sameAs Q7203812.
- Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum sameAs Q7203812.
- Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum wasDerivedFrom Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum?oldid=588117342.
- Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum isPrimaryTopicOf Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum.
- Pleasant_Grove_City_v._Summum name "Pleasant Grove City, Utah, et al. v. Summum".