Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Priestly_v_Fowler> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 18 of
18
with 100 items per page.
- Priestly_v_Fowler abstract "Priestly v Fowler (1837) 3 Mees & Wels. 1 is an old English tort law case, which introduced the old rule of common employment (or "fellow servant rule" in the United States). This is idea that the employer is not liable for injuries caused by one employee to another in the course of their employment. The rule was removed in its entirety in the United Kingdom by the Law Reform (Personal Injuries) Act 1948.Despite this, there was no allegation by the plaintiff in this case "about the act of any fellow servant or indeed any suggestion that the duty sought to be put on the employer was other than a primary duty to ensure that the van was a safe conveyance."".
- Priestly_v_Fowler wikiPageExternalLink PPA23,M1.
- Priestly_v_Fowler wikiPageID "22799732".
- Priestly_v_Fowler wikiPageRevisionID "566774822".
- Priestly_v_Fowler hasPhotoCollection Priestly_v_Fowler.
- Priestly_v_Fowler subject Category:1837_in_case_law.
- Priestly_v_Fowler subject Category:1837_in_the_United_Kingdom.
- Priestly_v_Fowler subject Category:English_tort_case_law.
- Priestly_v_Fowler subject Category:Exchequer_of_Pleas.
- Priestly_v_Fowler subject Category:Law_articles_needing_an_infobox.
- Priestly_v_Fowler subject Category:United_Kingdom_labour_case_law.
- Priestly_v_Fowler comment "Priestly v Fowler (1837) 3 Mees & Wels. 1 is an old English tort law case, which introduced the old rule of common employment (or "fellow servant rule" in the United States). This is idea that the employer is not liable for injuries caused by one employee to another in the course of their employment.".
- Priestly_v_Fowler label "Priestly v Fowler".
- Priestly_v_Fowler sameAs m.0641b4j.
- Priestly_v_Fowler sameAs Q7242925.
- Priestly_v_Fowler sameAs Q7242925.
- Priestly_v_Fowler wasDerivedFrom Priestly_v_Fowler?oldid=566774822.
- Priestly_v_Fowler isPrimaryTopicOf Priestly_v_Fowler.