Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/R._v._Buhay> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 25 of
25
with 100 items per page.
- R._v._Buhay abstract "R. v. Buhay [2003] 1 S.C.R. 631, 2003 SCC 30 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on the Charter rights protecting against unreasonable search and seizure (section 8) and the criteria for the exclusion of evidence under section 24(2). The court held that for evidence to be excluded on the Collins test, the seriousness of the breach must be determined by looking at factors such as good faith and necessity. On the facts, marijuana found in a bus station locker was excluded from evidence because the police had insufficient reason to search it without a warrant.".
- R._v._Buhay wikiPageID "2909214".
- R._v._Buhay wikiPageRevisionID "519896985".
- R._v._Buhay caseName "R. v. Buhay".
- R._v._Buhay citations "[2003] 1 S.C.R. 631, 2003 SCC 30, 225 D.L.R. 624, [2004] 4 W.W.R. 1, 174 C.C.C. 97, 107 C.R.R. 240, 10 C.R. 205, 177 Man. R. 72, 177 Man. R. 72".
- R._v._Buhay decidedDate "2003-06-05".
- R._v._Buhay docket "28667".
- R._v._Buhay fullCaseName "Mervyn Allen Buhay v. Her Majesty The Queen".
- R._v._Buhay hasPhotoCollection R._v._Buhay.
- R._v._Buhay heardDate "2002-11-01".
- R._v._Buhay history "Judgment for the Crown in the Manitoba Court of Appeal.".
- R._v._Buhay ratio "A person has a reasonable expectation of privacy in a locked locker in a public area, where the person has possession of the locker's key.".
- R._v._Buhay ruling "Appeal allowed.".
- R._v._Buhay scc "2002".
- R._v._Buhay unanimous "Arbour J.".
- R._v._Buhay subject Category:2003_in_Canadian_case_law.
- R._v._Buhay subject Category:Section_Eight_Charter_case_law.
- R._v._Buhay subject Category:Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases.
- R._v._Buhay comment "R. v. Buhay [2003] 1 S.C.R. 631, 2003 SCC 30 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on the Charter rights protecting against unreasonable search and seizure (section 8) and the criteria for the exclusion of evidence under section 24(2). The court held that for evidence to be excluded on the Collins test, the seriousness of the breach must be determined by looking at factors such as good faith and necessity.".
- R._v._Buhay label "R. v. Buhay".
- R._v._Buhay sameAs m.08bx8y.
- R._v._Buhay sameAs Q7274185.
- R._v._Buhay sameAs Q7274185.
- R._v._Buhay wasDerivedFrom R._v._Buhay?oldid=519896985.
- R._v._Buhay isPrimaryTopicOf R._v._Buhay.