Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/R._v._Neil> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 22 of
22
with 100 items per page.
- R._v._Neil abstract "R. v. Neil, [2002] 3 S.C.R. 631, 2002 SCC 70, is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on conflict of interests among lawyers. The Court held that both firms and lawyers have a fiduciary duty of loyalty to their clients and so lawyer or firm cannot represent a client whose interests may be adverse to the interests of another client unless there is consent and a reasonable belief that the interests will not be adverse. This greatly expanded the old rules of conflict of interest which required actual knowledge of confidential information before a lawyer was in conflict.".
- R._v._Neil wikiPageID "10558205".
- R._v._Neil wikiPageRevisionID "587215778".
- R._v._Neil caseName "R. v. Neil".
- R._v._Neil citations "[2002] 3 S.C.R. 631, 2002 SCC 70".
- R._v._Neil decidedDate "2002-11-01".
- R._v._Neil docket "28282".
- R._v._Neil fullCaseName "David Lloyd Neil v. Her Majesty The Queen".
- R._v._Neil hasPhotoCollection R._v._Neil.
- R._v._Neil heardDate "2002-01-25".
- R._v._Neil ruling "Appeal dismissed".
- R._v._Neil scc "2001".
- R._v._Neil unanimous "Binnie J.".
- R._v._Neil subject Category:2002_in_Canadian_case_law.
- R._v._Neil subject Category:Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases.
- R._v._Neil comment "R. v. Neil, [2002] 3 S.C.R. 631, 2002 SCC 70, is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on conflict of interests among lawyers. The Court held that both firms and lawyers have a fiduciary duty of loyalty to their clients and so lawyer or firm cannot represent a client whose interests may be adverse to the interests of another client unless there is consent and a reasonable belief that the interests will not be adverse.".
- R._v._Neil label "R. v. Neil".
- R._v._Neil sameAs m.02qhs0w.
- R._v._Neil sameAs Q7274278.
- R._v._Neil sameAs Q7274278.
- R._v._Neil wasDerivedFrom R._v._Neil?oldid=587215778.
- R._v._Neil isPrimaryTopicOf R._v._Neil.