Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/R._v._Starr> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 31 of
31
with 100 items per page.
- R._v._Starr abstract "R. v. Starr [2000] 2 S.C.R. 144 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision that re-evaluated several principles of evidence. In particular, they held that the "principled approach" hearsay evidence under R. v. Khan and R. v. Smith (1992) can be equally used to exclude otherwise admissible hearsay evidence. In addition, the Court examined the judge's charge to the jury on the standard of beyond a reasonable doubt.".
- R._v._Starr wikiPageExternalLink documentloader.aspx?id=45418.
- R._v._Starr wikiPageID "3706310".
- R._v._Starr wikiPageRevisionID "517217849".
- R._v._Starr caseName "R. v. Starr".
- R._v._Starr chiefJustice "Antonio Lamer C.J. /Beverley McLachlin C.J.".
- R._v._Starr citations "[2000] 2 S.C.R. 144, 2000 SCC 40".
- R._v._Starr decidedDate "2000-09-29".
- R._v._Starr dissent "L’Heureux‑Dubé J.".
- R._v._Starr dissent "McLachlin C.J.".
- R._v._Starr fullCaseName "Robert Dennis Starr v. Her Majesty The Queen".
- R._v._Starr hasPhotoCollection R._v._Starr.
- R._v._Starr heardDate "--02-24".
- R._v._Starr heardDate "1998-12-03".
- R._v._Starr joindissent "Bastarache J.".
- R._v._Starr joindissent "Gonthier J.".
- R._v._Starr joinmajority "Major, Binnie, Arbour and Lebel JJ.".
- R._v._Starr lawsapplied "R. v. Lifchus, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 320".
- R._v._Starr majority "Iacobucci J.".
- R._v._Starr puisneJustices "( hearing only, rehearing only)".
- R._v._Starr puisneJustices "L’Heureux‑Dubé, Gonthier, Cory, McLachlin , Iacobucci, Major , Bastarache, Binnie, Arbour and LeBel JJ.".
- R._v._Starr subject Category:2000_in_Canadian_case_law.
- R._v._Starr subject Category:Canadian_evidence_case_law.
- R._v._Starr subject Category:Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases.
- R._v._Starr comment "R. v. Starr [2000] 2 S.C.R. 144 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision that re-evaluated several principles of evidence. In particular, they held that the "principled approach" hearsay evidence under R. v. Khan and R. v. Smith (1992) can be equally used to exclude otherwise admissible hearsay evidence. In addition, the Court examined the judge's charge to the jury on the standard of beyond a reasonable doubt.".
- R._v._Starr label "R. v. Starr".
- R._v._Starr sameAs m.09wdx1.
- R._v._Starr sameAs Q7274309.
- R._v._Starr sameAs Q7274309.
- R._v._Starr wasDerivedFrom R._v._Starr?oldid=517217849.
- R._v._Starr isPrimaryTopicOf R._v._Starr.