Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/R._v._Stone> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 24 of
24
with 100 items per page.
- R._v._Stone abstract "R. v. Stone, [1999] 2 S.C.R. 290 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on the use of the defence of automatism in a criminal trial.".
- R._v._Stone wikiPageID "4350453".
- R._v._Stone wikiPageRevisionID "604189597".
- R._v._Stone caseName "R. v. Stone".
- R._v._Stone chiefJustice Antonio_Lamer.
- R._v._Stone citations "[1999] 2 S.C.R. 290".
- R._v._Stone decidedDate "1999-05-27".
- R._v._Stone dissent "Binnie J.".
- R._v._Stone docket "25969".
- R._v._Stone fullCaseName "Bert Thomas Stone v. Her Majesty the Queen".
- R._v._Stone hasPhotoCollection R._v._Stone.
- R._v._Stone heardDate "1998-06-26".
- R._v._Stone majority "Bastarache J.".
- R._v._Stone priorHistory "British Columbia Court of Appeal in favour of the Crown".
- R._v._Stone puisneJustices "Claire L’Heureux‑Dubé, Charles Gonthier, Peter Cory, Beverley McLachlin, Frank Iacobucci, John C. Major, Michel Bastarache and Ian Binnie JJ.".
- R._v._Stone subject Category:1999_in_Canadian_case_law.
- R._v._Stone subject Category:Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases.
- R._v._Stone comment "R. v. Stone, [1999] 2 S.C.R. 290 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on the use of the defence of automatism in a criminal trial.".
- R._v._Stone label "R. v. Stone".
- R._v._Stone sameAs m.0byk2m.
- R._v._Stone sameAs Q7274313.
- R._v._Stone sameAs Q7274313.
- R._v._Stone wasDerivedFrom R._v._Stone?oldid=604189597.
- R._v._Stone isPrimaryTopicOf R._v._Stone.