Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/R_v_Chaytor> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 29 of
29
with 100 items per page.
- R_v_Chaytor abstract "R v Chaytor and others [2010] UKSC 52 was a 2010 judgment of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom. The case concerned the trials of three former Members of Parliament for false accounting in relation to the Parliamentary expenses scandal of 2009.During their trials, the three MPs (David Chaytor, Elliot Morley and Jim Devine) had each separately argued unsuccessfully that there was no case to answer as expenses claims were covered by the doctrine of Parliamentary privilege and could not be the basis of criminal charges. They appealed (along with Lord Hanningfield) to the Court of Appeal where three of the most senior judges in that court (Lord Judge LCJ, Lord Neuberger MR and Sir Anthony May – the President of the Queen's Bench Division) had dismissed their arguments.The MPs (although not Lord Hanningfield) successfully applied to the Supreme Court for permission to appeal the decision. The Supreme Court, comprising nine judges to reflect the importance of the matter, heard arguments over two days in October 2010 before unanimously rejecting the submission that Parliamentary privilege under either the common law or the Bill of Rights 1689 protected the defendants from prosecution.As a consequence, each case was referred back to the Crown Court. Chaytor and Morley pleaded guilty to dishonesty offences and Devine was found guilty at trial. Each received sentences of between 16 and 18 months imprisonment in relation to their expenses claims.".
- R_v_Chaytor wikiPageExternalLink UKSC_2010_0195_Judgment.pdf.
- R_v_Chaytor wikiPageID "32128424".
- R_v_Chaytor wikiPageRevisionID "603250521".
- R_v_Chaytor areaOfLaw Constitutional_law.
- R_v_Chaytor areaOfLaw Parliamentary_privilege.
- R_v_Chaytor areaOfLaw Theft_Act_1968.
- R_v_Chaytor arguedate "--10-19".
- R_v_Chaytor argueyear "2010".
- R_v_Chaytor decidedate "--12-01".
- R_v_Chaytor decideyear "2010".
- R_v_Chaytor fullname "R v Chaytor and others".
- R_v_Chaytor hasPhotoCollection R_v_Chaytor.
- R_v_Chaytor holding "Members of Parliament could be prosecuted for false accounting in relation to the Parliamentary expenses scandal without violating Parliamentary privilege".
- R_v_Chaytor litigants "R v Chaytor".
- R_v_Chaytor majority "Lord Phillips & Lord Rodger , Lord Clarke".
- R_v_Chaytor neutralCitation UKSC_2010_0195_Judgment.pdf.
- R_v_Chaytor prior "[2010] EWCA Crim 1910".
- R_v_Chaytor subject Category:2010_in_case_law.
- R_v_Chaytor subject Category:2010_in_the_United_Kingdom.
- R_v_Chaytor subject Category:English_case_law.
- R_v_Chaytor subject Category:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_Kingdom_cases.
- R_v_Chaytor comment "R v Chaytor and others [2010] UKSC 52 was a 2010 judgment of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom.".
- R_v_Chaytor label "R v Chaytor".
- R_v_Chaytor sameAs m.0gx0fph.
- R_v_Chaytor sameAs Q7278257.
- R_v_Chaytor sameAs Q7278257.
- R_v_Chaytor wasDerivedFrom R_v_Chaytor?oldid=603250521.
- R_v_Chaytor isPrimaryTopicOf R_v_Chaytor.