Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Rambus_Inc._v._Nvidia> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 23 of
23
with 100 items per page.
- Rambus_Inc._v._Nvidia abstract "Rambus Inc. v. NVIDIA Corporation was a patent infringement case heard in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. In 2008, Rambus Inc. initially filed a complaint accusing NVIDIA Corporation of infringing seventeen Rambus patents. Rambus Inc. licenses patents it owns to companies, these patents are either acquired and purchased from third parties, or are acquired through the filing of new technologies developed at Rambus. Since its founding in 1990, Rambus has acquired patents on many of the components that make up memory controllers and modern computer processor chips. NVIDIA manufactures and distributes Graphics Processing Units (GPU). GPUs debuted in 1999 and have since greatly enhanced computer graphics and parallel processing capabilities. In this case, starting in July 2008, Rambus argued that NVIDIA's units infringed its patents on SDR, DDR, DDR2, DDR3, GDDR and GDDR3 technologies, to name a few. Rambus sought a preliminary injunction and compensation for damages under 35 U.S.C. § 284 in addition to an adjudication that NVIDIA has infringed and continues to infringe the Rambus patents. Early on, Rambus dropped two of the seventeen patent infringement claims due to covenant dealings. NVIDIA moved for a stay on the remaining fifteen patents pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1659 . Judge Susan Illston ordered for a stay on nine patents, pending a ruling from the International Trade Commission (ITC) in which Rambus was filing similar patent infringement suits against NVIDIA as well as other related chip and memory manufacturing companies. The request to stay on the remaining six patents was denied. Later on it was settled that the nine patents presented in another ITC case were unenforceable in the case of Micron v. Rambus. In July, 2010, ITC ruled that NVIDIA violated three patents belonging to Rambus. NVIDIA soon signed a license with Rambus while appealing the ITC ruling.".
- Rambus_Inc._v._Nvidia wikiPageID "33456372".
- Rambus_Inc._v._Nvidia wikiPageRevisionID "558046058".
- Rambus_Inc._v._Nvidia citations "C 08-3343 SI;C 08-5500 SI".
- Rambus_Inc._v._Nvidia court United_States_District_Court_for_the_Northern_District_of_California.
- Rambus_Inc._v._Nvidia date "March 2012".
- Rambus_Inc._v._Nvidia dateDecided "2010-07-26".
- Rambus_Inc._v._Nvidia hasPhotoCollection Rambus_Inc._v._Nvidia.
- Rambus_Inc._v._Nvidia holding "ITC ruled NVIDIA has violated three patents belonging to Rambus".
- Rambus_Inc._v._Nvidia inaccurate "y".
- Rambus_Inc._v._Nvidia judge Susan_Illston.
- Rambus_Inc._v._Nvidia keywords Intellectual_property.
- Rambus_Inc._v._Nvidia keywords Patent.
- Rambus_Inc._v._Nvidia name "Rambus Inc. v. NVIDIA Corporation".
- Rambus_Inc._v._Nvidia subject Category:Nvidia.
- Rambus_Inc._v._Nvidia subject Category:United_States_patent_case_law.
- Rambus_Inc._v._Nvidia comment "Rambus Inc. v. NVIDIA Corporation was a patent infringement case heard in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. In 2008, Rambus Inc. initially filed a complaint accusing NVIDIA Corporation of infringing seventeen Rambus patents. Rambus Inc. licenses patents it owns to companies, these patents are either acquired and purchased from third parties, or are acquired through the filing of new technologies developed at Rambus.".
- Rambus_Inc._v._Nvidia label "Rambus Inc. v. Nvidia".
- Rambus_Inc._v._Nvidia sameAs m.0h94ftg.
- Rambus_Inc._v._Nvidia sameAs Q7289273.
- Rambus_Inc._v._Nvidia sameAs Q7289273.
- Rambus_Inc._v._Nvidia wasDerivedFrom Rambus_Inc._v._Nvidia?oldid=558046058.
- Rambus_Inc._v._Nvidia isPrimaryTopicOf Rambus_Inc._v._Nvidia.