Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Rind_et_al._controversy> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 18 of
18
with 100 items per page.
- Rind_et_al._controversy abstract "The Rind et al. controversy was a debate in the scientific literature, public media, and government legislatures in the United States regarding a 1998 peer reviewed meta-analysis of the self-reported harm caused by child sexual abuse (CSA). The debate resulted in the unprecedented condemnation of the paper by both Houses of the United States Congress. The social science research community was concerned that the condemnation by government legislatures might have a chilling effect on the future publication of controversial research results.The study's lead author was psychologist Bruce Rind, and it expanded on a 1997 meta-analysis for which Rind was also lead author. The authors stated their goal was to determine whether CSA caused pervasive, significant psychological harm for both males and females, controversially concluding that the harm caused by child sexual abuse was not necessarily intense or pervasive, that the prevailing construct of CSA was not scientifically valid, as it failed empirical verification, and that the psychological damage caused by the abusive encounters depends on other factors such as the degree of coercion or force involved. The authors concluded that even though CSA may not result in lifelong, significant harm to all victims, this does not mean it is not morally wrong and indicated that their findings did not imply current moral and legal prohibitions against CSA should be changed.Seven years after the publication of Rind et al.'s (1998) meta-analysis, Heather Marie Ulrich, with two colleagues, replicated the study in The Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice and confirmed its main findings, although they did not endorse its authors' conclusions.The Rind paper has been quoted by people and organizations advocating age of consent reform, but also by pedophile groups in support of their efforts to change attitudes towards pedophilia and to decriminalize sexual activity between adults and minors (children or adolescents), as well as by defense attorneys who have used the study to minimize harm in child sexual abuse cases.".
- Rind_et_al._controversy wikiPageID "666901".
- Rind_et_al._controversy wikiPageRevisionID "604332688".
- Rind_et_al._controversy hasPhotoCollection Rind_et_al._controversy.
- Rind_et_al._controversy subject Category:Meta-analysis.
- Rind_et_al._controversy subject Category:Scientific_controversies.
- Rind_et_al._controversy subject Category:Sexual_abuse.
- Rind_et_al._controversy comment "The Rind et al. controversy was a debate in the scientific literature, public media, and government legislatures in the United States regarding a 1998 peer reviewed meta-analysis of the self-reported harm caused by child sexual abuse (CSA). The debate resulted in the unprecedented condemnation of the paper by both Houses of the United States Congress.".
- Rind_et_al._controversy label "Affaire de l'étude de Rind, Tromovitch et Bauserman".
- Rind_et_al._controversy label "Controvérsia de Rind et al.".
- Rind_et_al._controversy label "Rind et al. controversy".
- Rind_et_al._controversy sameAs Affaire_de_l'étude_de_Rind,_Tromovitch_et_Bauserman.
- Rind_et_al._controversy sameAs Controvérsia_de_Rind_et_al..
- Rind_et_al._controversy sameAs m.0315pf.
- Rind_et_al._controversy sameAs Q2742869.
- Rind_et_al._controversy sameAs Q2742869.
- Rind_et_al._controversy wasDerivedFrom Rind_et_al._controversy?oldid=604332688.
- Rind_et_al._controversy isPrimaryTopicOf Rind_et_al._controversy.