Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Samuels_v._McCurdy> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 31 of
31
with 100 items per page.
- Samuels_v._McCurdy abstract "Samuels v. McCurdy, 267 U.S. 188 (1925), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the application of ex post facto in the case where an object was legally possessed, but was then banned by statute. The court found that ex post facto does not apply, because possession is an ongoing condition.This law is not an ex post facto law. It does not provide a punishment for a past offense. It does not fix a penalty for the owner for having become possessed of the liquor. The penalty it imposes is for continuing to possess the liquor after the enactment of the law.".
- Samuels_v._McCurdy wikiPageID "38521005".
- Samuels_v._McCurdy wikiPageRevisionID "563802266".
- Samuels_v._McCurdy arguedate "--01-22".
- Samuels_v._McCurdy argueyear "1925".
- Samuels_v._McCurdy decidedate "--03-02".
- Samuels_v._McCurdy decideyear "1925".
- Samuels_v._McCurdy dissent "Butler".
- Samuels_v._McCurdy fullname "Samuels v. McCurdy, Sheriff of Dekalb County, Georgia".
- Samuels_v._McCurdy hasPhotoCollection Samuels_v._McCurdy.
- Samuels_v._McCurdy joinmajority "Holmes, Van Devanter, Brandeis, Sutherland, Sanford".
- Samuels_v._McCurdy litigants "Samuels v. McCurdy".
- Samuels_v._McCurdy majority "Taft".
- Samuels_v._McCurdy parallelcitations "45".
- Samuels_v._McCurdy uspage "188".
- Samuels_v._McCurdy usvol "267".
- Samuels_v._McCurdy subject Category:1925_in_United_States_case_law.
- Samuels_v._McCurdy subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Samuels_v._McCurdy type Case.
- Samuels_v._McCurdy type LegalCase.
- Samuels_v._McCurdy type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Samuels_v._McCurdy type UnitOfWork.
- Samuels_v._McCurdy type Situation.
- Samuels_v._McCurdy comment "Samuels v. McCurdy, 267 U.S. 188 (1925), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the application of ex post facto in the case where an object was legally possessed, but was then banned by statute. The court found that ex post facto does not apply, because possession is an ongoing condition.This law is not an ex post facto law. It does not provide a punishment for a past offense. It does not fix a penalty for the owner for having become possessed of the liquor.".
- Samuels_v._McCurdy label "Samuels v. McCurdy".
- Samuels_v._McCurdy sameAs m.0r4rnzj.
- Samuels_v._McCurdy sameAs Q7413034.
- Samuels_v._McCurdy sameAs Q7413034.
- Samuels_v._McCurdy wasDerivedFrom Samuels_v._McCurdy?oldid=563802266.
- Samuels_v._McCurdy isPrimaryTopicOf Samuels_v._McCurdy.
- Samuels_v._McCurdy name "Samuels v. McCurdy, Sheriff of Dekalb County, Georgia".