Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 47 of
47
with 100 items per page.
- Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen abstract "Southern Pacific Company v. Jensen, 244 U.S. 205 (1917), was a United States Supreme Court case concerning the geographical extent of state workers' compensation laws. The Court held that the New York Workmen's Compensation Act, as applied to laborers in the New York Harbor, intruded on federal admiralty jurisdiction, and that civil suits arising within this jurisdiction were subject to the common law of the sea. The compensation statute passed by the state interfered with federal power and was therefore unconstitutional.The case is noted for the dissent written by Justice Holmes, specifically his dicta on the nature of the common law:The common law is not a brooding omnipresence in the sky, but the articulate voice of some sovereign or quasi sovereign that can be identified.".
- Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen wikiPageExternalLink getcase.pl?court=us&vol=244&invol=205.
- Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen wikiPageExternalLink southern-pacific-company-v-marie-jensen.
- Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen wikiPageExternalLink 205.
- Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen wikiPageID "30778813".
- Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen wikiPageRevisionID "586234976".
- Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen arguedate "--02-28".
- Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen argueyear "1916".
- Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen case "Southern Pacific Co. v. Jensen, 244 U.S. 205".
- Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen citation "37".
- Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen decidedate "--05-21".
- Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen decideyear "1917".
- Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen dissent "Holmes".
- Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen dissent "Pitney".
- Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen findlaw getcase.pl?court=us&vol=244&invol=205.
- Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen fullname "Southern Pacific Company v. Marie Jensen".
- Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen hasPhotoCollection Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen.
- Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen holding "State legislation affecting maritime commerce is invalid if it contravenes the essential purpose expressed by an act of Congress, or works material prejudice to the characteristic features of the general maritime law, or interfere with the proper harmony and uniformity of the law in its international and interstate relations.".
- Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen joindissent "Brandeis, Clarke".
- Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen joinmajority "White, Day, Van Devanter, McKenna".
- Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen justia 205.
- Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen litigants "Southern Pacific Company v. Jensen".
- Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen majority "McReynolds".
- Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen otherSource "Open Jurist".
- Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen otherUrl southern-pacific-company-v-marie-jensen.
- Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen prior "Error to the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Judicial Department, of the State of New York".
- Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen rearguedatea "--01-31".
- Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen rearguedateb "--02-01".
- Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen reargueyear "1917".
- Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen scotus "1916".
- Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen uspage "205".
- Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen usvol "244".
- Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen subject Category:1917_in_United_States_case_law.
- Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen type Case.
- Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen type LegalCase.
- Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen type UnitOfWork.
- Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen type Situation.
- Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen comment "Southern Pacific Company v. Jensen, 244 U.S. 205 (1917), was a United States Supreme Court case concerning the geographical extent of state workers' compensation laws. The Court held that the New York Workmen's Compensation Act, as applied to laborers in the New York Harbor, intruded on federal admiralty jurisdiction, and that civil suits arising within this jurisdiction were subject to the common law of the sea.".
- Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen label "Southern Pacific Company v. Jensen".
- Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen sameAs m.0gfdrx0.
- Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen sameAs Q7570278.
- Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen sameAs Q7570278.
- Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen wasDerivedFrom Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen?oldid=586234976.
- Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen isPrimaryTopicOf Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen.
- Southern_Pacific_Company_v._Jensen name "Southern Pacific Company v. Marie Jensen".