Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Tak_and_co_Inc_v_AEL_Corp_Ltd> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 18 of
18
with 100 items per page.
- Tak_and_co_Inc_v_AEL_Corp_Ltd abstract "Tak and Co Inc v AEL Corp Ltd (1995) 5 NZBLC 103,887 is an often cited in NZ case law regarding the parol evidence rule, which effectively reinforces English case of Henderson v Arthur [1907] 1 KB 10. This case is often also cited regarding the award for exemplary damages.".
- Tak_and_co_Inc_v_AEL_Corp_Ltd wikiPageID "41858662".
- Tak_and_co_Inc_v_AEL_Corp_Ltd wikiPageRevisionID "599083962".
- Tak_and_co_Inc_v_AEL_Corp_Ltd citations "5".
- Tak_and_co_Inc_v_AEL_Corp_Ltd court High_Court_of_New_Zealand.
- Tak_and_co_Inc_v_AEL_Corp_Ltd fullName "Tak and Co Inc v AEL Corp Limited".
- Tak_and_co_Inc_v_AEL_Corp_Ltd judges "Hammond J".
- Tak_and_co_Inc_v_AEL_Corp_Ltd keywords "parol evidence rule, exemplary damages".
- Tak_and_co_Inc_v_AEL_Corp_Ltd name "Tak and Co Inc v AEL Corp Ltd".
- Tak_and_co_Inc_v_AEL_Corp_Ltd subject Category:New_Zealand_case_law.
- Tak_and_co_Inc_v_AEL_Corp_Ltd subject Category:New_Zealand_contract_case_law.
- Tak_and_co_Inc_v_AEL_Corp_Ltd comment "Tak and Co Inc v AEL Corp Ltd (1995) 5 NZBLC 103,887 is an often cited in NZ case law regarding the parol evidence rule, which effectively reinforces English case of Henderson v Arthur [1907] 1 KB 10. This case is often also cited regarding the award for exemplary damages.".
- Tak_and_co_Inc_v_AEL_Corp_Ltd label "Tak and co Inc v AEL Corp Ltd".
- Tak_and_co_Inc_v_AEL_Corp_Ltd sameAs m.0_l9fj7.
- Tak_and_co_Inc_v_AEL_Corp_Ltd sameAs Q17065734.
- Tak_and_co_Inc_v_AEL_Corp_Ltd sameAs Q17065734.
- Tak_and_co_Inc_v_AEL_Corp_Ltd wasDerivedFrom Tak_and_co_Inc_v_AEL_Corp_Ltd?oldid=599083962.
- Tak_and_co_Inc_v_AEL_Corp_Ltd isPrimaryTopicOf Tak_and_co_Inc_v_AEL_Corp_Ltd.