Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Texas_v._White> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 51 of
51
with 100 items per page.
- Texas_v._White abstract "Texas v. White, 74 U.S. 700 (1869) was a significant case argued before the United States Supreme Court in 1869. The case involved a claim by the Reconstruction government of Texas that United States bonds owned by Texas since 1850 had been illegally sold by the Confederate state legislature during the American Civil War. The state filed suit directly with the United States Supreme Court, which, under the United States Constitution, retains original jurisdiction on certain cases in which a state is a party.In accepting original jurisdiction, the court ruled that Texas had remained a state ever since it first joined the Union, despite its joining the Confederate States of America and its being under military rule at the time of the decision in the case. In deciding the merits of the bond issue, the court further held that the Constitution did not permit states to unilaterally secede from the United States, and that the ordinances of secession, and all the acts of the legislatures within seceding states intended to give effect to such ordinances, were "absolutely null".".
- Texas_v._White wikiPageExternalLink scholar_case?case=1134912565671891096&q=74+us+700&hl=en&as_sdt=2,14.
- Texas_v._White wikiPageExternalLink USSC_CR_0074_0700_ZO.html.
- Texas_v._White wikiPageID "1300385".
- Texas_v._White wikiPageRevisionID "603436745".
- Texas_v._White arguedate "--02-05".
- Texas_v._White argueyear "1869".
- Texas_v._White citation "74".
- Texas_v._White concurrence "Clifford, Davis, Field".
- Texas_v._White dissent "Swayne".
- Texas_v._White decidedate "--04-12".
- Texas_v._White decideyear "1869".
- Texas_v._White dissent "Grier".
- Texas_v._White fullname "Texas v. White, et al.".
- Texas_v._White hasPhotoCollection Texas_v._White.
- Texas_v._White holding "Texas never left the Union during the Civil War, because a state cannot unilaterally secede from the United States.".
- Texas_v._White holding "Treasury bond sales by Texas during the war were invalid, and the bonds were therefore still owned by the post-war state.".
- Texas_v._White dissent "Miller".
- Texas_v._White joinmajority "Nelson".
- Texas_v._White lawsapplied Article_Four_of_the_United_States_Constitution.
- Texas_v._White litigants "Texas v. White".
- Texas_v._White majority "Chase".
- Texas_v._White scotus "1867".
- Texas_v._White uspage "700".
- Texas_v._White usvol "74".
- Texas_v._White subject Category:1869_in_Texas.
- Texas_v._White subject Category:1869_in_United_States_case_law.
- Texas_v._White subject Category:Government_bonds.
- Texas_v._White subject Category:Legal_history_of_Texas.
- Texas_v._White subject Category:Secession_in_the_United_States.
- Texas_v._White subject Category:Texas_in_the_American_Civil_War.
- Texas_v._White subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Texas_v._White subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_original_jurisdiction_cases.
- Texas_v._White type Case.
- Texas_v._White type LegalCase.
- Texas_v._White type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Texas_v._White type UnitOfWork.
- Texas_v._White type Event.
- Texas_v._White type Situation.
- Texas_v._White comment "Texas v. White, 74 U.S. 700 (1869) was a significant case argued before the United States Supreme Court in 1869. The case involved a claim by the Reconstruction government of Texas that United States bonds owned by Texas since 1850 had been illegally sold by the Confederate state legislature during the American Civil War.".
- Texas_v._White label "Caso Texas contra White".
- Texas_v._White label "Texas v. White".
- Texas_v._White label "Texas v. White".
- Texas_v._White sameAs Texas_v._White.
- Texas_v._White sameAs Caso_Texas_contra_White.
- Texas_v._White sameAs m.04r2ck.
- Texas_v._White sameAs Q2407695.
- Texas_v._White sameAs Q2407695.
- Texas_v._White wasDerivedFrom Texas_v._White?oldid=603436745.
- Texas_v._White isPrimaryTopicOf Texas_v._White.
- Texas_v._White name "Texas v. White, et al.".