Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/United_States_v._Comstock> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 45 of
45
with 100 items per page.
- United_States_v._Comstock abstract "United States v. Comstock, 560 U.S. 126 (2010), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States, which held that the federal government has authority under the Necessary and Proper Clause to require the civil commitment of individuals already in Federal custody. The practice, introduced by the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act, was upheld against a challenge that it fell outside the enumerated powers granted to Congress by the Constitution. The decision did not rule on any other aspect of the law's constitutionality, because only the particular issue of Congressional authority was properly before the Court.".
- United_States_v._Comstock wikiPageID "27384457".
- United_States_v._Comstock wikiPageRevisionID "572428471".
- United_States_v._Comstock arguedate "--01-12".
- United_States_v._Comstock argueyear "2010".
- United_States_v._Comstock concurrence "Alito".
- United_States_v._Comstock concurrence "Kennedy".
- United_States_v._Comstock decidedate "--05-17".
- United_States_v._Comstock decideyear "2010".
- United_States_v._Comstock dissent "Thomas".
- United_States_v._Comstock docket "8".
- United_States_v._Comstock fullname "United States, Petitioner v. Graydon Earl Comstock, Jr., et al.".
- United_States_v._Comstock hasPhotoCollection United_States_v._Comstock.
- United_States_v._Comstock holding "The federal government may order the civil commitment of a mentally ill, sexually dangerous person beyond the conclusion of his sentence.".
- United_States_v._Comstock joindissent "Scalia".
- United_States_v._Comstock joinmajority "Roberts, Stevens, Ginsburg, Sotomayor".
- United_States_v._Comstock litigants "United States v. Comstock".
- United_States_v._Comstock majority "Breyer".
- United_States_v._Comstock scotus "2009".
- United_States_v._Comstock uspage "126".
- United_States_v._Comstock usvol "560".
- United_States_v._Comstock subject Category:2010_in_United_States_case_law.
- United_States_v._Comstock subject Category:Mental_health_law_in_the_United_States.
- United_States_v._Comstock subject Category:Sex_laws.
- United_States_v._Comstock subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- United_States_v._Comstock type Abstraction100002137.
- United_States_v._Comstock type Collection107951464.
- United_States_v._Comstock type Group100031264.
- United_States_v._Comstock type Law108441203.
- United_States_v._Comstock type SexLaws.
- United_States_v._Comstock type Case.
- United_States_v._Comstock type LegalCase.
- United_States_v._Comstock type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- United_States_v._Comstock type UnitOfWork.
- United_States_v._Comstock type Situation.
- United_States_v._Comstock comment "United States v. Comstock, 560 U.S. 126 (2010), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States, which held that the federal government has authority under the Necessary and Proper Clause to require the civil commitment of individuals already in Federal custody. The practice, introduced by the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act, was upheld against a challenge that it fell outside the enumerated powers granted to Congress by the Constitution.".
- United_States_v._Comstock label "United States v. Comstock".
- United_States_v._Comstock sameAs 미국_대_컴스톡_사건.
- United_States_v._Comstock sameAs m.0by0nh3.
- United_States_v._Comstock sameAs Q11241879.
- United_States_v._Comstock sameAs Q11241879.
- United_States_v._Comstock sameAs United_States_v._Comstock.
- United_States_v._Comstock wasDerivedFrom United_States_v._Comstock?oldid=572428471.
- United_States_v._Comstock isPrimaryTopicOf United_States_v._Comstock.
- United_States_v._Comstock name "United States, Petitioner v. Graydon Earl Comstock, Jr., et al.".