Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/United_States_v._Fordice> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 35 of
35
with 100 items per page.
- United_States_v._Fordice abstract "United States v. Fordice, 505 U.S. 717 (1992) is a United States Supreme Court case that resulted in an eight to one ruling that the eight public universities in Mississippi had not sufficiently integrated and that the state must take affirmative action to change this under the Equal Protection Clause. The Court found that, although the state had eliminated explicit prohibitions on the admission of black students to institutions including the University of Mississippi, Mississippi State University, and the University of Southern Mississippi, the Court of Appeals had not properly reviewed the set of discriminatory policies used by the state to suppress black enrollment at these schools.Four opinions were filed in the case. In addition to Justice White's majority opinion, Justice O'Connor and Justice Thomas filed concurring opinions. Thomas, in particular, expressed a concern that the strict review of policies that divided students by race should not be used against historically black universities in the state.Justice Scalia filed a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part, expressing his disagreement with the burden that the Court imposed on universities and his concern that the standards set forth by the Court would create confusion and lead to more litigation.".
- United_States_v._Fordice wikiPageID "9586643".
- United_States_v._Fordice wikiPageRevisionID "474337271".
- United_States_v._Fordice arguedate "--11-13".
- United_States_v._Fordice argueyear "1991".
- United_States_v._Fordice concurrence "O'Connor".
- United_States_v._Fordice concurrence "Thomas".
- United_States_v._Fordice dissent "Scalia".
- United_States_v._Fordice decidedate "--06-26".
- United_States_v._Fordice decideyear "1992".
- United_States_v._Fordice fullname "United States v. Fordice".
- United_States_v._Fordice hasPhotoCollection United_States_v._Fordice.
- United_States_v._Fordice holding "The eight public universities in Mississippi had not sufficiently integrated and that the state must take action to change this under the Equal Protection Clause. The system was not declared unconstitutional; simply the court ruled that more action needed to be taken to ensure integration.".
- United_States_v._Fordice joinmajority "Rehnquist, Blackmun, Stevens, O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter, and Thomas".
- United_States_v._Fordice litigants "United States v. Fordice".
- United_States_v._Fordice majority "White".
- United_States_v._Fordice scotus "1991".
- United_States_v._Fordice uspage "717".
- United_States_v._Fordice usvol "505".
- United_States_v._Fordice subject Category:1992_in_United_States_case_law.
- United_States_v._Fordice subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- United_States_v._Fordice type Case.
- United_States_v._Fordice type LegalCase.
- United_States_v._Fordice type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- United_States_v._Fordice type UnitOfWork.
- United_States_v._Fordice type Event.
- United_States_v._Fordice type Situation.
- United_States_v._Fordice comment "United States v. Fordice, 505 U.S. 717 (1992) is a United States Supreme Court case that resulted in an eight to one ruling that the eight public universities in Mississippi had not sufficiently integrated and that the state must take affirmative action to change this under the Equal Protection Clause.".
- United_States_v._Fordice label "United States v. Fordice".
- United_States_v._Fordice sameAs m.02pkz3f.
- United_States_v._Fordice sameAs Q7893286.
- United_States_v._Fordice sameAs Q7893286.
- United_States_v._Fordice wasDerivedFrom United_States_v._Fordice?oldid=474337271.
- United_States_v._Fordice isPrimaryTopicOf United_States_v._Fordice.
- United_States_v._Fordice name "United States v. Fordice".