Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/United_States_v._Knotts> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 43 of
43
with 100 items per page.
- United_States_v._Knotts abstract "United States v. Knotts, 460 U.S. 276 is a 1983 United States Supreme Court case regarding the use of an electronic surveillance device. The defendants argued that the use of this device was a Fourth Amendment violation. The device in question was described as a beeper that could only be tracked from a short distance. During a single trip, officers followed a car containing the beeper, relying on beeper signal to determine the car's final destination. The Court unanimously held that since the use of such a device did not violate a legitimate expectation of privacy there was no search and seizure and thus the use was allowed without a warrant. It reasoned that a person traveling in public has no expectation of privacy in one's movements. Since there was no search and seizure there was not a Fourth Amendment violation.".
- United_States_v._Knotts wikiPageExternalLink case.html.
- United_States_v._Knotts wikiPageID "31740492".
- United_States_v._Knotts wikiPageRevisionID "585624671".
- United_States_v._Knotts arguedate "--12-06".
- United_States_v._Knotts argueyear "1982".
- United_States_v._Knotts concurrence "Blackmun".
- United_States_v._Knotts concurrence "Brennan".
- United_States_v._Knotts concurrence "Stevens".
- United_States_v._Knotts decidedate "--03-02".
- United_States_v._Knotts decideyear "1983".
- United_States_v._Knotts fullname "United States v. Knotts".
- United_States_v._Knotts hasPhotoCollection United_States_v._Knotts.
- United_States_v._Knotts holding "A radio transmitter may be used to aid the police in their physical pursuit of a suspect".
- United_States_v._Knotts joinconcurrence "Brennan, Marshall".
- United_States_v._Knotts joinconcurrence "Brennan, Marshall, Stevens".
- United_States_v._Knotts joinconcurrence "Marshall".
- United_States_v._Knotts joinmajority "Burger, White, Powell, and O'Connor".
- United_States_v._Knotts lawsapplied Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution.
- United_States_v._Knotts litigants "United States v. Knotts".
- United_States_v._Knotts majority "Rehnquist".
- United_States_v._Knotts scotus "1981".
- United_States_v._Knotts uspage "276".
- United_States_v._Knotts usvol "460".
- United_States_v._Knotts subject Category:1983_in_United_States_case_law.
- United_States_v._Knotts subject Category:Methamphetamine_in_the_United_States.
- United_States_v._Knotts subject Category:Pagers.
- United_States_v._Knotts subject Category:United_States_Fourth_Amendment_case_law.
- United_States_v._Knotts subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- United_States_v._Knotts subject Category:United_States_controlled_substances_case_law.
- United_States_v._Knotts type Case.
- United_States_v._Knotts type LegalCase.
- United_States_v._Knotts type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- United_States_v._Knotts type UnitOfWork.
- United_States_v._Knotts type Situation.
- United_States_v._Knotts comment "United States v. Knotts, 460 U.S. 276 is a 1983 United States Supreme Court case regarding the use of an electronic surveillance device. The defendants argued that the use of this device was a Fourth Amendment violation. The device in question was described as a beeper that could only be tracked from a short distance. During a single trip, officers followed a car containing the beeper, relying on beeper signal to determine the car's final destination.".
- United_States_v._Knotts label "United States v. Knotts".
- United_States_v._Knotts sameAs m.0gtw3y0.
- United_States_v._Knotts sameAs Q7893370.
- United_States_v._Knotts sameAs Q7893370.
- United_States_v._Knotts wasDerivedFrom United_States_v._Knotts?oldid=585624671.
- United_States_v._Knotts isPrimaryTopicOf United_States_v._Knotts.
- United_States_v._Knotts name "United States v. Knotts".