Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/United_States_v._Place> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 49 of
49
with 100 items per page.
- United_States_v._Place abstract "United States v. Place, 462 U.S. 696 (1983) was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States, which held that a sniff by a police dog specially trained to detect the presence of narcotics is not a "search" under the meaning of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Court reasoned that the sniff of a dog is sui generis, intended to reveal only the presence or absence of narcotics. Because a dog sniff is so limited a test, the Court carved out this exception from the broad category of "searches" for which a warrant is generally required.".
- United_States_v._Place wikiPageExternalLink getcase.pl?court=US&vol=462&invol=696.
- United_States_v._Place wikiPageExternalLink scholar_case?case=5031844227599510007.
- United_States_v._Place wikiPageExternalLink case.html.
- United_States_v._Place wikiPageID "1603403".
- United_States_v._Place wikiPageRevisionID "562748138".
- United_States_v._Place arguedate "--03-02".
- United_States_v._Place argueyear "1983".
- United_States_v._Place case "United States v. Place, 462 U.S. 696".
- United_States_v._Place citation "172800.0".
- United_States_v._Place concurrence "Blackmun".
- United_States_v._Place concurrence "Brennan".
- United_States_v._Place decidedate "--06-20".
- United_States_v._Place decideyear "1983".
- United_States_v._Place findlaw getcase.pl?court=US&vol=462&invol=696.
- United_States_v._Place fullname "United States of America v. Raymond J. Place".
- United_States_v._Place hasPhotoCollection United_States_v._Place.
- United_States_v._Place holding "A dog sniff is not a "search" within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment.".
- United_States_v._Place joinconcurrence "Marshall".
- United_States_v._Place joinmajority "Burger, White, Rehnquist, Powell, Stevens".
- United_States_v._Place justia case.html.
- United_States_v._Place lawsapplied Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution.
- United_States_v._Place litigants "United States v. Place".
- United_States_v._Place majority "O'Connor".
- United_States_v._Place otherSource "Google Scholar".
- United_States_v._Place otherUrl scholar_case?case=5031844227599510007.
- United_States_v._Place prior "17280.0".
- United_States_v._Place scotus "1981".
- United_States_v._Place uspage "696".
- United_States_v._Place usvol "462".
- United_States_v._Place subject Category:1983_in_United_States_case_law.
- United_States_v._Place subject Category:Search_and_seizure_case_law.
- United_States_v._Place subject Category:United_States_Fourth_Amendment_case_law.
- United_States_v._Place subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- United_States_v._Place subject Category:United_States_controlled_substances_case_law.
- United_States_v._Place type Case.
- United_States_v._Place type LegalCase.
- United_States_v._Place type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- United_States_v._Place type UnitOfWork.
- United_States_v._Place type Event.
- United_States_v._Place type Situation.
- United_States_v._Place comment "United States v. Place, 462 U.S. 696 (1983) was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States, which held that a sniff by a police dog specially trained to detect the presence of narcotics is not a "search" under the meaning of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Court reasoned that the sniff of a dog is sui generis, intended to reveal only the presence or absence of narcotics.".
- United_States_v._Place label "United States v. Place".
- United_States_v._Place sameAs m.05fxt6.
- United_States_v._Place sameAs Q7893439.
- United_States_v._Place sameAs Q7893439.
- United_States_v._Place wasDerivedFrom United_States_v._Place?oldid=562748138.
- United_States_v._Place isPrimaryTopicOf United_States_v._Place.
- United_States_v._Place name "United States of America v. Raymond J. Place".