Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/United_States_v._U.S._District_Court> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 51 of
51
with 100 items per page.
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court abstract "United States v. U.S. District Court, 407 U.S. 297 (1972), also known as the Keith case, was a landmark United States Supreme Court decision that upheld, in a unanimous 8-0 ruling, the requirements of the Fourth Amendment in cases of domestic surveillance targeting a domestic threat.The United States charged John Sinclair, Lawrence 'Pun' Plamondon, and John Forrest with conspiracy to destroy government property. One of the defendants, Lawrence 'Pun' Plamondon, was also charged with the dynamite bombing of an office of the Central Intelligence Agency in Ann Arbor, Michigan. The defendants were leaders of the radical White Panther Party. In response to a pretrial motion by the defense for disclosure of all electronic surveillance information, Nixon's attorney general, John Mitchell, claimed he authorized the wiretaps pursuant to Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 and was not required to disclose the sources. Though warrantless, the act allows for an exception to prevent the overthrow of the government and when "any other clear and present danger to the structure or existence of the Government" exists. The Government contended that since the defendants were members of a domestic organization attempting to subvert and destroy it, this case fell under the exception clause.After reading the briefs and hearing oral arguments by a then young Constitutional attorney, Hugh "Buck" Davis, Judge Damon Keith of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan disagreed and ordered the Government to disclose all of the illegally intercepted conversations to the defendants. The Government appealed, filing a petition for a writ of mandamus with the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit to set aside the order. The Sixth Circuit also rejected the Government's arguments and upheld the lower court decision. The Supreme Court granted a writ of certiorari and heard the case.".
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court wikiPageExternalLink getcase.pl?navby=CASE&court=US&vol=407&page=297.
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court wikiPageExternalLink United-States-v-U-S-District-Court-Significance.html.
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court wikiPageExternalLink viewcontent.cgi?article=1047&context=columbia_pllt.
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court wikiPageExternalLink case.html.
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court wikiPageExternalLink USSC_CR_0407_0297_ZS.html.
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court wikiPageExternalLink UP00881.pdf.
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court wikiPageID "3767497".
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court wikiPageRevisionID "591493168".
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court arguedate "--02-24".
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court argueyear "1972".
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court case "United States v. U.S. District Court, 407 U.S. 297".
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court concurrence "Burger".
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court concurrence "Douglas".
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court concurrence "White".
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court decidedate "--06-19".
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court decideyear "1972".
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court findlaw getcase.pl?navby=CASE&court=US&vol=407&page=297.
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court fullname "United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, et al.".
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court hasPhotoCollection United_States_v._U.S._District_Court.
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court holding "The Court held government officials were obligated to obtain a warrant before beginning electronic surveillance even if domestic security issues were involved. The "inherent vagueness of the domestic security concept" and the potential for abusing it to quell political dissent made the Fourth Amendment protections especially important when the government engaged in spying on its own citizens.".
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court joinmajority "Douglas, Brennan, Stewart, Marshall, Blackmun".
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court justia case.html.
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court lawsapplied Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution.
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court litigants "United States v. U.S. District Court".
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court majority "Powell".
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court notparticipating "Rehnquist".
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court otherSource "LII".
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court otherUrl USSC_CR_0407_0297_ZS.html.
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court scotus "1972".
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court uspage "297".
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court usvol "407".
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court subject Category:1972_in_United_States_case_law.
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court subject Category:United_States_Fourth_Amendment_case_law.
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court type Case.
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court type LegalCase.
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court type UnitOfWork.
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court type Event.
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court type Situation.
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court comment "United States v. U.S. District Court, 407 U.S. 297 (1972), also known as the Keith case, was a landmark United States Supreme Court decision that upheld, in a unanimous 8-0 ruling, the requirements of the Fourth Amendment in cases of domestic surveillance targeting a domestic threat.The United States charged John Sinclair, Lawrence 'Pun' Plamondon, and John Forrest with conspiracy to destroy government property.".
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court label "United States v. U.S. District Court".
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court label "United States v. U.S. District Court".
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court sameAs United_States_v._U.S._District_Court.
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court sameAs m.09zybd.
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court sameAs Q2791142.
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court sameAs Q2791142.
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court wasDerivedFrom United_States_v._U.S._District_Court?oldid=591493168.
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court isPrimaryTopicOf United_States_v._U.S._District_Court.
- United_States_v._U.S._District_Court name "United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, et al. (Plamondon, et al., real parties in interest)".