Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/United_States_v._Wurzbach> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 37 of
37
with 100 items per page.
- United_States_v._Wurzbach abstract "United States v. Wurzbach, 280 U.S. 396 (1930), is a unanimous ruling by the United States Supreme Court which held that the term "political purpose," as used in the Federal Corrupt Practices Act, was not impermissibly vague. The Supreme Court reversed the district court, which had quashed an indictment under the Act.Harry M. Wurzbach, a member of the United States House of Representatives from Texas, was indicted under the Federal Corrupt Practices Act on the ground that he had received money from employees of the United States government. The District Court of the United States for the Western District of Texas had thrown out the indictment on two grounds: 1) That the term "political purpose" did not include the behavior in question; and 2) If the term did include the behavior, then the Act was unconstitutional.".
- United_States_v._Wurzbach wikiPageExternalLink 396.html.
- United_States_v._Wurzbach wikiPageExternalLink case.html.
- United_States_v._Wurzbach wikiPageID "27621501".
- United_States_v._Wurzbach wikiPageRevisionID "573577217".
- United_States_v._Wurzbach arguedate "--01-20".
- United_States_v._Wurzbach argueyear "1930".
- United_States_v._Wurzbach citation "50".
- United_States_v._Wurzbach decidedate "--02-24".
- United_States_v._Wurzbach decideyear "1930".
- United_States_v._Wurzbach fullname "United States v. Wurzbach".
- United_States_v._Wurzbach hasPhotoCollection United_States_v._Wurzbach.
- United_States_v._Wurzbach holding "--08-15".
- United_States_v._Wurzbach joinmajority "Taft, Van Devanter, McReynolds, Brandeis, Sutherland, Butler, Sanford, Stone".
- United_States_v._Wurzbach litigants "United States v. Wurzbach".
- United_States_v._Wurzbach majority "Holmes".
- United_States_v._Wurzbach prior "Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Texas".
- United_States_v._Wurzbach scotus "1925".
- United_States_v._Wurzbach uspage "396".
- United_States_v._Wurzbach usvol "280".
- United_States_v._Wurzbach subject Category:1930_in_United_States_case_law.
- United_States_v._Wurzbach subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- United_States_v._Wurzbach subject Category:United_States_elections_case_law.
- United_States_v._Wurzbach subject Category:Void_for_vagueness_case_law.
- United_States_v._Wurzbach type Case.
- United_States_v._Wurzbach type LegalCase.
- United_States_v._Wurzbach type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- United_States_v._Wurzbach type UnitOfWork.
- United_States_v._Wurzbach type Situation.
- United_States_v._Wurzbach comment "United States v. Wurzbach, 280 U.S. 396 (1930), is a unanimous ruling by the United States Supreme Court which held that the term "political purpose," as used in the Federal Corrupt Practices Act, was not impermissibly vague. The Supreme Court reversed the district court, which had quashed an indictment under the Act.Harry M.".
- United_States_v._Wurzbach label "United States v. Wurzbach".
- United_States_v._Wurzbach sameAs m.0c3zbz4.
- United_States_v._Wurzbach sameAs Q7893532.
- United_States_v._Wurzbach sameAs Q7893532.
- United_States_v._Wurzbach wasDerivedFrom United_States_v._Wurzbach?oldid=573577217.
- United_States_v._Wurzbach isPrimaryTopicOf United_States_v._Wurzbach.
- United_States_v._Wurzbach name "United States v. Wurzbach".