Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Upjohn_v._United_States> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 38 of
38
with 100 items per page.
- Upjohn_v._United_States abstract "Upjohn Co. v. United States, 449 U.S. 383 (1981), was a Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a company could invoke the attorney–client privilege to protect communications made between company lawyers and non-management employees. In doing so, the Court rejected the narrower control group test that had previously governed many organizational attorney–client privilege issues. Under the control group test, only employees who exercised direct control over the managerial decisions of the company were eligible to have their communications with corporate lawyers protected.The case also expanded the scope of the work-product doctrine.".
- Upjohn_v._United_States wikiPageExternalLink getcase.pl?navby=CASE&court=US&vol=449&page=383.
- Upjohn_v._United_States wikiPageExternalLink 1980_79_886.
- Upjohn_v._United_States wikiPageID "4545905".
- Upjohn_v._United_States wikiPageRevisionID "531144493".
- Upjohn_v._United_States arguedate "--11-05".
- Upjohn_v._United_States argueyear "1980".
- Upjohn_v._United_States citation "172800.0".
- Upjohn_v._United_States concurrence "Burger".
- Upjohn_v._United_States decidedate "--01-13".
- Upjohn_v._United_States decideyear "1981".
- Upjohn_v._United_States fullname "Upjohn Company, et al. v. United States, et al.".
- Upjohn_v._United_States hasPhotoCollection Upjohn_v._United_States.
- Upjohn_v._United_States holding "District Court's test, of availability of attorney–client privilege, was objectionable as it restricted availability of privilege to those corporate officers who played “substantial role” in deciding and directing corporation's legal response; where communications at issue were made by corporate employees to counsel for corporation acting as such, at direction of corporate superiors in order to secure legal advice from counsel, and employees were aware that they were being questioned so that corporation could obtain advice, such communications were protected; and where notes and memoranda sought by government were work products based on oral statements of witnesses, they were, if they revealed communications, protected by privilege, and to extent they did not reveal communications, they revealed attorney's mental processes in evaluating the communications and disclosure would not be required simply on showing of substantial need and inability to obtain equivalent without undue hardship.".
- Upjohn_v._United_States joinmajority "Brennan, Stewart, White, Marshall, Blackmun, Powell, Stevens, Burger".
- Upjohn_v._United_States litigants "Upjohn v. United States".
- Upjohn_v._United_States majority "Rehnquist".
- Upjohn_v._United_States prior "Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit".
- Upjohn_v._United_States scotus "1975".
- Upjohn_v._United_States uspage "383".
- Upjohn_v._United_States usvol "449".
- Upjohn_v._United_States subject Category:1981_in_United_States_case_law.
- Upjohn_v._United_States subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Upjohn_v._United_States subject Category:United_States_attorney–client_privilege_case_law.
- Upjohn_v._United_States type Case.
- Upjohn_v._United_States type LegalCase.
- Upjohn_v._United_States type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Upjohn_v._United_States type UnitOfWork.
- Upjohn_v._United_States type Event.
- Upjohn_v._United_States type Situation.
- Upjohn_v._United_States comment "Upjohn Co. v. United States, 449 U.S. 383 (1981), was a Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a company could invoke the attorney–client privilege to protect communications made between company lawyers and non-management employees. In doing so, the Court rejected the narrower control group test that had previously governed many organizational attorney–client privilege issues.".
- Upjohn_v._United_States label "Upjohn v. United States".
- Upjohn_v._United_States sameAs m.0c85cp.
- Upjohn_v._United_States sameAs Q7898329.
- Upjohn_v._United_States sameAs Q7898329.
- Upjohn_v._United_States wasDerivedFrom Upjohn_v._United_States?oldid=531144493.
- Upjohn_v._United_States isPrimaryTopicOf Upjohn_v._United_States.
- Upjohn_v._United_States name "Upjohn Company, et al. v. United States, et al.".