Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/White_v_White> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 26 of
26
with 100 items per page.
- White_v_White abstract "White v White is an English family law decision by the House of Lords, and a landmark case in redistribution of finances as well as property on divorce. This case involved a couple with assets exceeding £4.5m which was more than either needs for their reasonable requirements. It was held that the absence of financial need did not mean departing from a more generous settlement for an applicant in big money cases. This, therefore, enables the courts to make settlements reflecting the wealth of the parties, and not just their needs and requirements. However, it seems clear from Lord Nicholls' leading speech that he intended much of what he said to apply to all ancillary relief cases, and not just big money ones. Lord Nicholls said that in all cases, regardless of division of assets, a judge would always be well advised to check his tentative views (on distribution of assets) against the "yardstick of equality of division". This was not to introduce a presumption of equality in all cases, but "to ensure the absence of discrimination", for instance, between a wage earner, and a child-carer, thereby recognising the non-financial contribution of the parent caring for children.".
- White_v_White wikiPageID "8744779".
- White_v_White wikiPageRevisionID "593327186".
- White_v_White casesCited "Burgess v Burgess [1996] 2 FLR 34, Calderbank v Calderbank [1976] Fam 93, Fitzpatrick v Sterling Housing Association Ltd [2001] 1 AC 27".
- White_v_White citations "[2001] 1 A.C. 596".
- White_v_White court "House of Lords".
- White_v_White dateDecided "2000-10-26".
- White_v_White fullName "Pamela White and Martin White".
- White_v_White judges "Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead, Lord Hoffmann, Lord Cooke of Thorndon, Lord Hope, and Lord Hutton".
- White_v_White keywords "Divorce; Financial provision; Matrimonial property; Partnerships".
- White_v_White legislationCited Family_Law_Act_1975.
- White_v_White legislationCited Matrimonial_Causes_Act_1973.
- White_v_White name "White v White".
- White_v_White subsequentActions "None".
- White_v_White subject Category:2000_in_England.
- White_v_White subject Category:2000_in_case_law.
- White_v_White subject Category:English_family_case_law.
- White_v_White subject Category:English_land_case_law.
- White_v_White subject Category:House_of_Lords_cases.
- White_v_White comment "White v White is an English family law decision by the House of Lords, and a landmark case in redistribution of finances as well as property on divorce. This case involved a couple with assets exceeding £4.5m which was more than either needs for their reasonable requirements. It was held that the absence of financial need did not mean departing from a more generous settlement for an applicant in big money cases.".
- White_v_White label "White v White".
- White_v_White sameAs m.027h5sy.
- White_v_White sameAs Q7995712.
- White_v_White sameAs Q7995712.
- White_v_White wasDerivedFrom White_v_White?oldid=593327186.
- White_v_White isPrimaryTopicOf White_v_White.