Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Califano_v._Goldfarb> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 38 of
38
with 100 items per page.
- Califano_v._Goldfarb abstract "Califano v. Goldfarb, 430 U.S. 199 (1977), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held that the different treatment of men and women mandated by 42 U.S.C. § 402(f)(1)(D) constituted invidious discrimination against female wage earners by affording them less protection for their surviving spouses than is provided to male employees, and therefore violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.".
- Califano_v._Goldfarb wikiPageID "18609654".
- Califano_v._Goldfarb wikiPageRevisionID "593557778".
- Califano_v._Goldfarb arguedate "--10-05".
- Califano_v._Goldfarb argueyear "1976".
- Califano_v._Goldfarb citation "17280.0".
- Califano_v._Goldfarb concurrence "Stevens".
- Califano_v._Goldfarb decidedate "--03-02".
- Califano_v._Goldfarb decideyear "1977".
- Califano_v._Goldfarb dissent "Rehnquist".
- Califano_v._Goldfarb fullname "Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare v. Leon Goldfarb".
- Califano_v._Goldfarb hasPhotoCollection Califano_v._Goldfarb.
- Califano_v._Goldfarb holding "The gender-based distinction created by 42 U.S.C. § 402 violates the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment.".
- Califano_v._Goldfarb joindissent "Burger, Stewart, Blackmun".
- Califano_v._Goldfarb joinmajority "White, Marshall, Powell".
- Califano_v._Goldfarb litigants "Califano v. Goldfarb".
- Califano_v._Goldfarb majority "Brennan".
- Califano_v._Goldfarb prior "Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York".
- Califano_v._Goldfarb scotus "1975".
- Califano_v._Goldfarb uspage "199".
- Califano_v._Goldfarb usvol "430".
- Califano_v._Goldfarb subject Category:1977_in_United_States_case_law.
- Califano_v._Goldfarb subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Califano_v._Goldfarb subject Category:United_States_equal_protection_case_law.
- Califano_v._Goldfarb type Case.
- Califano_v._Goldfarb type LegalCase.
- Califano_v._Goldfarb type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Califano_v._Goldfarb type UnitOfWork.
- Califano_v._Goldfarb type Event.
- Califano_v._Goldfarb type Situation.
- Califano_v._Goldfarb comment "Califano v. Goldfarb, 430 U.S. 199 (1977), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held that the different treatment of men and women mandated by 42 U.S.C. § 402(f)(1)(D) constituted invidious discrimination against female wage earners by affording them less protection for their surviving spouses than is provided to male employees, and therefore violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.".
- Califano_v._Goldfarb label "Califano v. Goldfarb".
- Califano_v._Goldfarb sameAs m.04gq0nq.
- Califano_v._Goldfarb sameAs Q5019917.
- Califano_v._Goldfarb sameAs Q5019917.
- Califano_v._Goldfarb wasDerivedFrom Califano_v._Goldfarb?oldid=593557778.
- Califano_v._Goldfarb isPrimaryTopicOf Califano_v._Goldfarb.
- Califano_v._Goldfarb name "Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare v. Leon Goldfarb".