Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Holmes_v._South_Carolina> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 42 of
42
with 100 items per page.
- Holmes_v._South_Carolina abstract "Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 (2006), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court involving the right of a criminal defendant to present evidence that a third party instead committed the crime. The Court vacated the rape and murder conviction in South Carolina of a man who had been denied the opportunity to present evidence of a third party's guilt, because the trial court believed the prosecutor's forensic evidence was too strong for the defendant's evidence to raise an inference of innocence. The Court ruled unanimously that this exclusion violated the right of a defendant to have a meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense, because the strength of a prosecutor's case had no logical relationship to whether a defendant's evidence was too weak to be admissible.The opinion was delivered by Justice Samuel Alito, and was his first opinion as a member of the Court following his confirmation on January 31, 2006. This follows a Supreme Court tradition that the first written opinion of a new justice reflect a unanimous decision. This case also marks the last time in six years that Clarence Thomas spoke during oral argument.".
- Holmes_v._South_Carolina wikiPageExternalLink 2021.
- Holmes_v._South_Carolina wikiPageExternalLink 04-1327.pdf.
- Holmes_v._South_Carolina wikiPageExternalLink 04-1327.pdf.
- Holmes_v._South_Carolina wikiPageID "5154930".
- Holmes_v._South_Carolina wikiPageRevisionID "518561441".
- Holmes_v._South_Carolina arguedate "--02-22".
- Holmes_v._South_Carolina argueyear "2006".
- Holmes_v._South_Carolina citation "2006".
- Holmes_v._South_Carolina decidedate "--05-01".
- Holmes_v._South_Carolina decideyear "2006".
- Holmes_v._South_Carolina docket "4".
- Holmes_v._South_Carolina fullname "Bobby Lee Holmes v. South Carolina".
- Holmes_v._South_Carolina hasPhotoCollection Holmes_v._South_Carolina.
- Holmes_v._South_Carolina holding "A State could not exclude evidence presented by a criminal defendant that a third party committed the crime simply because the prosecution had a strong case. South Carolina Supreme Court vacated and remanded.".
- Holmes_v._South_Carolina joinmajority "unanimous".
- Holmes_v._South_Carolina lawsapplied Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution.
- Holmes_v._South_Carolina lawsapplied Sixth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution.
- Holmes_v._South_Carolina litigants "Holmes v. South Carolina".
- Holmes_v._South_Carolina majority "Alito".
- Holmes_v._South_Carolina prior "17280.0".
- Holmes_v._South_Carolina scotus "2006".
- Holmes_v._South_Carolina uspage "319".
- Holmes_v._South_Carolina usvol "547".
- Holmes_v._South_Carolina subject Category:2006_in_United_States_case_law.
- Holmes_v._South_Carolina subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Holmes_v._South_Carolina subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court.
- Holmes_v._South_Carolina subject Category:United_States_criminal_due_process_case_law.
- Holmes_v._South_Carolina type Case.
- Holmes_v._South_Carolina type LegalCase.
- Holmes_v._South_Carolina type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Holmes_v._South_Carolina type UnitOfWork.
- Holmes_v._South_Carolina type Event.
- Holmes_v._South_Carolina type Situation.
- Holmes_v._South_Carolina comment "Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 (2006), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court involving the right of a criminal defendant to present evidence that a third party instead committed the crime.".
- Holmes_v._South_Carolina label "Holmes v. South Carolina".
- Holmes_v._South_Carolina sameAs m.0d59x2.
- Holmes_v._South_Carolina sameAs Q5883663.
- Holmes_v._South_Carolina sameAs Q5883663.
- Holmes_v._South_Carolina wasDerivedFrom Holmes_v._South_Carolina?oldid=518561441.
- Holmes_v._South_Carolina isPrimaryTopicOf Holmes_v._South_Carolina.
- Holmes_v._South_Carolina name "Bobby Lee Holmes v. South Carolina".