Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Marcus_v._Search_Warrant> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 55 of
55
with 100 items per page.
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant abstract "Marcus v. Search Warrant, 367 U.S. 717 (1961), full title Marcus v. Search Warrant of Property at 104 East Tenth Street, Kansas City, Missouri, is an in rem case decided by the United States Supreme Court on the seizure of obscene materials. The Court unanimously overturned a Missouri Supreme Court decision upholding the forfeiture of hundreds of magazines confiscated from a Kansas City wholesaler. It held that both Missouri's procedures for the seizure of allegedly obscene material and the execution of the warrant itself violated the Fourth and Fourteenth amendments' prohibitions on search and seizure without due process. Those violations, in turn, threatened the rights protected by the First Amendment.The case had begun in 1957, when the Kansas City Police Department vice squad raided the warehouse of a local news distributor and five newsstands. Officers seized dozens of publications, far beyond those which had started the investigation, since the search warrants were not specific. Less than half of the seized titles were ultimately found obscene and ordered to be burnt.Justice William Brennan wrote for the Court. He found the officers' conduct similar to that which had inspired the Founding Fathers to write the Fourth Amendment. He added that the Missouri Supreme Court had incorrectly applied an earlier Court holding in sustaining the forfeiture. The result was a system that operated as an effective prior restraint. Hugo Black, in a concurring opinion, joined by William O. Douglas restated his conviction that the Fourteenth Amendment applies all the rights protected by the Constitution to the states.Marcus broke ground in holding that First Amendment interests required an additional layer of procedure than other instances of seizure. It would figure prominently in later obscenity cases involving seizures, including one called Quantity of Books v. Kansas, that explicitly tried to take its holding into account. After the Court settled on a definition of obscenity in the early 1970s, it continued to hear other cases on the issues first addressed in Marcus.".
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant wikiPageExternalLink getcase.pl?court=us&vol=367&invol=717.
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant wikiPageExternalLink scholar_case?case=5243554286848647628.
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant wikiPageExternalLink 717.
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant wikiPageExternalLink case.html.
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant wikiPageExternalLink argument.
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant wikiPageExternalLink opinion.
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant wikiPageID "31347075".
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant wikiPageRevisionID "573831456".
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant arguedate "--03-30".
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant argueyear "1961".
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant case "Marcus v. Search Warrant, 367 U.S. 717".
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant citation "172800.0".
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant concurrence "Black".
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant decidedate "--06-19".
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant decideyear "1961".
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant docket "60".
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant findlaw getcase.pl?court=us&vol=367&invol=717.
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant fullname "Marcus v. Search Warrant of Property at 104 East Tenth Street, Kansas City, Missouri".
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant hasPhotoCollection Marcus_v._Search_Warrant.
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant holding "Where material to be seized may be protected by First Amendment, search warrant must be as specific as possible as to items to be seized; seizure itself must be limited only to items enumerated in warrant. Missouri Supreme Court reversed and remanded".
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant joinconcurrence "Douglas".
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant justia 717.
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant lawsapplied "U.S. Const. Amds. I, IV and XIV".
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant litigants "Marcus v. Search Warrant".
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant majority "Brennan".
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant opinionannouncement opinion.
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant oralargument argument.
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant otherSource "Google Scholar".
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant otherSource "Nolo".
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant otherUrl scholar_case?case=5243554286848647628.
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant otherUrl case.html.
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant prior "172800.0".
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant scotus "1958".
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant uspage "717".
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant usvol "367".
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant subject Category:1961_in_United_States_case_law.
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant subject Category:United_States_Fourth_Amendment_case_law.
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant subject Category:United_States_civil_forfeiture_case_law.
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant subject Category:United_States_in_rem_cases.
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant subject Category:United_States_obscenity_case_law.
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant type Case.
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant type LegalCase.
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant type UnitOfWork.
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant type Situation.
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant comment "Marcus v. Search Warrant, 367 U.S. 717 (1961), full title Marcus v. Search Warrant of Property at 104 East Tenth Street, Kansas City, Missouri, is an in rem case decided by the United States Supreme Court on the seizure of obscene materials. The Court unanimously overturned a Missouri Supreme Court decision upholding the forfeiture of hundreds of magazines confiscated from a Kansas City wholesaler.".
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant label "Marcus v. Search Warrant".
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant sameAs m.0gkxkf0.
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant sameAs Q6758556.
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant sameAs Q6758556.
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant wasDerivedFrom Marcus_v._Search_Warrant?oldid=573831456.
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant isPrimaryTopicOf Marcus_v._Search_Warrant.
- Marcus_v._Search_Warrant name "Marcus v. Search Warrant of Property at 104 East Tenth Street, Kansas City, Missouri".