Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Personnel_Administrator_of_Massachusetts_v._Feeney> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 45 of
45
with 100 items per page.
- Personnel_Administrator_of_Massachusetts_v._Feeney abstract "Personnel Administrator of Massachusetts v. Feeney, 442 U.S. 256 (1979), was a case heard by the Supreme Court of the United States. The Supreme Court's decision upheld the constitutionality of a state law giving hiring preference to veterans over non-veterans. The law was challenged as violating the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution by a woman, who argued that the law discriminated on the basis of sex because so few women held veteran status.".
- Personnel_Administrator_of_Massachusetts_v._Feeney wikiPageExternalLink 256.html.
- Personnel_Administrator_of_Massachusetts_v._Feeney wikiPageExternalLink case.html.
- Personnel_Administrator_of_Massachusetts_v._Feeney wikiPageID "19212594".
- Personnel_Administrator_of_Massachusetts_v._Feeney wikiPageRevisionID "545423069".
- Personnel_Administrator_of_Massachusetts_v._Feeney arguedate "--02-26".
- Personnel_Administrator_of_Massachusetts_v._Feeney argueyear "1979".
- Personnel_Administrator_of_Massachusetts_v._Feeney case "Personnel Administrator of Massachusetts v. Feeney, 442 U.S. 256".
- Personnel_Administrator_of_Massachusetts_v._Feeney citation "172800.0".
- Personnel_Administrator_of_Massachusetts_v._Feeney concurrence "Stevens".
- Personnel_Administrator_of_Massachusetts_v._Feeney decidedate "--06-05".
- Personnel_Administrator_of_Massachusetts_v._Feeney decideyear "1979".
- Personnel_Administrator_of_Massachusetts_v._Feeney dissent "Marshall".
- Personnel_Administrator_of_Massachusetts_v._Feeney findlaw 256.html.
- Personnel_Administrator_of_Massachusetts_v._Feeney fullname "Personnel Administrator of Massachusetts et al. v. Feeney".
- Personnel_Administrator_of_Massachusetts_v._Feeney hasPhotoCollection Personnel_Administrator_of_Massachusetts_v._Feeney.
- Personnel_Administrator_of_Massachusetts_v._Feeney holding "A state law giving hiring preference to veterans over non-veterans does not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution".
- Personnel_Administrator_of_Massachusetts_v._Feeney joinconcurrence "White".
- Personnel_Administrator_of_Massachusetts_v._Feeney joindissent "Brennan".
- Personnel_Administrator_of_Massachusetts_v._Feeney joinmajority "Burger, White, Powell, Blackmun, Rehnquist, and Stevens".
- Personnel_Administrator_of_Massachusetts_v._Feeney justia case.html.
- Personnel_Administrator_of_Massachusetts_v._Feeney lawsapplied Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution.
- Personnel_Administrator_of_Massachusetts_v._Feeney litigants "Personnel Administrator of Massachusetts v. Feeney".
- Personnel_Administrator_of_Massachusetts_v._Feeney majority "Stewart".
- Personnel_Administrator_of_Massachusetts_v._Feeney prior "451".
- Personnel_Administrator_of_Massachusetts_v._Feeney scotus "1975".
- Personnel_Administrator_of_Massachusetts_v._Feeney uspage "256".
- Personnel_Administrator_of_Massachusetts_v._Feeney usvol "442".
- Personnel_Administrator_of_Massachusetts_v._Feeney subject Category:1979_in_United_States_case_law.
- Personnel_Administrator_of_Massachusetts_v._Feeney subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Personnel_Administrator_of_Massachusetts_v._Feeney subject Category:United_States_equal_protection_case_law.
- Personnel_Administrator_of_Massachusetts_v._Feeney type Case.
- Personnel_Administrator_of_Massachusetts_v._Feeney type LegalCase.
- Personnel_Administrator_of_Massachusetts_v._Feeney type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Personnel_Administrator_of_Massachusetts_v._Feeney type UnitOfWork.
- Personnel_Administrator_of_Massachusetts_v._Feeney type Situation.
- Personnel_Administrator_of_Massachusetts_v._Feeney comment "Personnel Administrator of Massachusetts v. Feeney, 442 U.S. 256 (1979), was a case heard by the Supreme Court of the United States. The Supreme Court's decision upheld the constitutionality of a state law giving hiring preference to veterans over non-veterans. The law was challenged as violating the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution by a woman, who argued that the law discriminated on the basis of sex because so few women held veteran status.".
- Personnel_Administrator_of_Massachusetts_v._Feeney label "Personnel Administrator of Massachusetts v. Feeney".
- Personnel_Administrator_of_Massachusetts_v._Feeney sameAs 매사추세츠_인사행정처_대_피니_사건.
- Personnel_Administrator_of_Massachusetts_v._Feeney sameAs m.04lk0b0.
- Personnel_Administrator_of_Massachusetts_v._Feeney sameAs Q7170681.
- Personnel_Administrator_of_Massachusetts_v._Feeney sameAs Q7170681.
- Personnel_Administrator_of_Massachusetts_v._Feeney wasDerivedFrom Personnel_Administrator_of_Massachusetts_v._Feeney?oldid=545423069.
- Personnel_Administrator_of_Massachusetts_v._Feeney isPrimaryTopicOf Personnel_Administrator_of_Massachusetts_v._Feeney.
- Personnel_Administrator_of_Massachusetts_v._Feeney name "Personnel Administrator of Massachusetts et al. v. Feeney".