Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Rose_v._Locke> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 44 of
44
with 100 items per page.
- Rose_v._Locke abstract "Rose v. Locke, 423 U.S. 48 (1975), was a United States Supreme Court case in which a Tennessee statute proscribing "crime against nature" was held not unconstitutionally vague as applied to cunnilingus, satisfying as it does the due process standard of giving sufficient warning that men may so conduct themselves as to avoid that which is forbidden. Viewed against that standard, the challenged statutory phrase is no vaguer than many other terms describing criminal offenses at common law, which are now codified in criminal codes. Moreover, the Tennessee Supreme Court by previously rejecting claims that the statute was to be narrowly applied has given sufficiently clear notice that it would be held applicable to acts such as those involved here when such a case as this arose.".
- Rose_v._Locke wikiPageExternalLink 48.html.
- Rose_v._Locke wikiPageID "12998166".
- Rose_v._Locke wikiPageRevisionID "563089769".
- Rose_v._Locke citation "17280.0".
- Rose_v._Locke dissent "Brennan".
- Rose_v._Locke dissent "Marshall".
- Rose_v._Locke dissent "Stewart".
- Rose_v._Locke decidedate "--11-17".
- Rose_v._Locke decideyear "1975".
- Rose_v._Locke fullname "Rose, Warden v. Locke".
- Rose_v._Locke hasPhotoCollection Rose_v._Locke.
- Rose_v._Locke holding "Statute proscribing "crime against nature" held not unconstitutionally vague as applied to cunnilingus, as the challenged statutory phrase is no vaguer than many other terms describing criminal offenses at common law, which are now codified in criminal codes".
- Rose_v._Locke litigants "Rose v. Locke".
- Rose_v._Locke percuriam "yes".
- Rose_v._Locke scotus "1975".
- Rose_v._Locke uspage "48".
- Rose_v._Locke usvol "423".
- Rose_v._Locke subject Category:1975_in_United_States_case_law.
- Rose_v._Locke subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Rose_v._Locke subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_per_curiam_opinions.
- Rose_v._Locke subject Category:Void_for_vagueness_case_law.
- Rose_v._Locke type Abstraction100002137.
- Rose_v._Locke type Belief105941423.
- Rose_v._Locke type Cognition100023271.
- Rose_v._Locke type Content105809192.
- Rose_v._Locke type Opinion105945642.
- Rose_v._Locke type PsychologicalFeature100023100.
- Rose_v._Locke type UnitedStatesSupremeCourtPerCuriamOpinions.
- Rose_v._Locke type Case.
- Rose_v._Locke type LegalCase.
- Rose_v._Locke type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Rose_v._Locke type UnitOfWork.
- Rose_v._Locke type Event.
- Rose_v._Locke type Situation.
- Rose_v._Locke comment "Rose v. Locke, 423 U.S. 48 (1975), was a United States Supreme Court case in which a Tennessee statute proscribing "crime against nature" was held not unconstitutionally vague as applied to cunnilingus, satisfying as it does the due process standard of giving sufficient warning that men may so conduct themselves as to avoid that which is forbidden.".
- Rose_v._Locke label "Rose v. Locke".
- Rose_v._Locke sameAs m.02z2sfn.
- Rose_v._Locke sameAs Q7368028.
- Rose_v._Locke sameAs Q7368028.
- Rose_v._Locke sameAs Rose_v._Locke.
- Rose_v._Locke wasDerivedFrom Rose_v._Locke?oldid=563089769.
- Rose_v._Locke isPrimaryTopicOf Rose_v._Locke.
- Rose_v._Locke name "Rose, Warden v. Locke".