Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Rostker_v._Goldberg> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 58 of
58
with 100 items per page.
- Rostker_v._Goldberg abstract "Rostker v. Goldberg, 453 U.S. 57 (1981), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court holding that the practice of requiring only men to register for the draft was constitutional. After extensive hearings, floor debate and committee sessions on the matter, the United States Congress enacted the law, as it had previously been, to apply to men only. Several attorneys including one Robert L. Goldberg subsequently challenged the gender distinction as unconstitutional. (The named defendant is Bernard D. Rostker, Director of the Selective Service System.)In a 6-to-3 decision, the Supreme Court held that this gender distinction was not a violation of the equal protection component of the due process clause, and that the Act would stand as passed.".
- Rostker_v._Goldberg wikiPageExternalLink getcase.pl?navby=CASE&court=US&vol=453&page=57.
- Rostker_v._Goldberg wikiPageExternalLink 1980_80_251.
- Rostker_v._Goldberg wikiPageID "4824659".
- Rostker_v._Goldberg wikiPageRevisionID "598771652".
- Rostker_v._Goldberg arguedate "--03-24".
- Rostker_v._Goldberg argueyear "1981".
- Rostker_v._Goldberg decidedate "--06-25".
- Rostker_v._Goldberg decideyear "1981".
- Rostker_v._Goldberg dissent "Marshall".
- Rostker_v._Goldberg dissent "White".
- Rostker_v._Goldberg fullname "Bernard Rostker, Director of Selective Service, et al. v. Robert L. Goldberg, et al.".
- Rostker_v._Goldberg hasPhotoCollection Rostker_v._Goldberg.
- Rostker_v._Goldberg holding "The Act's registration provisions do not violate the Fifth Amendment. Congress acted well within its constitutional authority to raise and regulate armies and navies when it authorized the registration of men and not women.".
- Rostker_v._Goldberg joindissent "Brennan".
- Rostker_v._Goldberg joinmajority "Burger, Stewart, Blackmun, Powell, Stevens".
- Rostker_v._Goldberg lawsapplied "*Military Selective Service Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 451 et seq.".
- Rostker_v._Goldberg lawsapplied "*U.S. Const. Amend. V.".
- Rostker_v._Goldberg litigants "Rostker v. Goldberg".
- Rostker_v._Goldberg majority "Rehnquist".
- Rostker_v._Goldberg scotus "1975".
- Rostker_v._Goldberg uspage "57".
- Rostker_v._Goldberg usvol "453".
- Rostker_v._Goldberg subject Category:1981_in_United_States_case_law.
- Rostker_v._Goldberg subject Category:Conscription_in_the_United_States.
- Rostker_v._Goldberg subject Category:Conscription_law.
- Rostker_v._Goldberg subject Category:Sexism.
- Rostker_v._Goldberg subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Rostker_v._Goldberg subject Category:United_States_equal_protection_case_law.
- Rostker_v._Goldberg subject Category:Women_in_the_United_States_military.
- Rostker_v._Goldberg type Adult109605289.
- Rostker_v._Goldberg type CausalAgent100007347.
- Rostker_v._Goldberg type Female109619168.
- Rostker_v._Goldberg type LivingThing100004258.
- Rostker_v._Goldberg type Object100002684.
- Rostker_v._Goldberg type Organism100004475.
- Rostker_v._Goldberg type Person100007846.
- Rostker_v._Goldberg type PhysicalEntity100001930.
- Rostker_v._Goldberg type Whole100003553.
- Rostker_v._Goldberg type Woman110787470.
- Rostker_v._Goldberg type WomenInTheUnitedStatesMilitary.
- Rostker_v._Goldberg type YagoLegalActor.
- Rostker_v._Goldberg type YagoLegalActorGeo.
- Rostker_v._Goldberg type Case.
- Rostker_v._Goldberg type LegalCase.
- Rostker_v._Goldberg type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Rostker_v._Goldberg type UnitOfWork.
- Rostker_v._Goldberg type Event.
- Rostker_v._Goldberg type Situation.
- Rostker_v._Goldberg comment "Rostker v. Goldberg, 453 U.S. 57 (1981), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court holding that the practice of requiring only men to register for the draft was constitutional. After extensive hearings, floor debate and committee sessions on the matter, the United States Congress enacted the law, as it had previously been, to apply to men only. Several attorneys including one Robert L. Goldberg subsequently challenged the gender distinction as unconstitutional.".
- Rostker_v._Goldberg label "Rostker v. Goldberg".
- Rostker_v._Goldberg sameAs m.0cps0p.
- Rostker_v._Goldberg sameAs Q7370028.
- Rostker_v._Goldberg sameAs Q7370028.
- Rostker_v._Goldberg sameAs Rostker_v._Goldberg.
- Rostker_v._Goldberg wasDerivedFrom Rostker_v._Goldberg?oldid=598771652.
- Rostker_v._Goldberg isPrimaryTopicOf Rostker_v._Goldberg.
- Rostker_v._Goldberg name "Bernard Rostker, Director of Selective Service, et al. v. Robert L. Goldberg, et al.".