Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Sherbert_v._Verner> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 49 of
49
with 100 items per page.
- Sherbert_v._Verner abstract "Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398 (1963), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment required that government demonstrate a compelling government interest before denying unemployment compensation to someone who was fired because their job conflicted with their religion.The case established the Sherbert Test, requiring demonstration of such a compelling interest in Free Exercise cases. This test was eventually all-but-eliminated in Employment Division v. Smith 494 U.S. 872 (1990). However, it was resurrected by Congress in the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) of 1993, but the Court in City of Boerne v. Flores, 521 U.S. 507 (1997) and Gonzales v. O Centro Espírita Beneficente União do Vegetal, 546 U.S. 418 (2006), limited its application to federal laws only.".
- Sherbert_v._Verner wikiPageExternalLink 5.
- Sherbert_v._Verner wikiPageExternalLink getcase.pl?navby=CASE&court=US&vol=374&page=398.
- Sherbert_v._Verner wikiPageExternalLink case.html.
- Sherbert_v._Verner wikiPageExternalLink faq.aspx?id=12923.
- Sherbert_v._Verner wikiPageID "5437780".
- Sherbert_v._Verner wikiPageRevisionID "583569440".
- Sherbert_v._Verner arguedate "--04-24".
- Sherbert_v._Verner argueyear "1963".
- Sherbert_v._Verner case "Sherbert v. Vernier, 374 U.S. 398".
- Sherbert_v._Verner citation "172800.0".
- Sherbert_v._Verner concurrence "Douglas".
- Sherbert_v._Verner concurrence "Stewart".
- Sherbert_v._Verner decidedate "--06-17".
- Sherbert_v._Verner decideyear "1963".
- Sherbert_v._Verner dissent "Harlan".
- Sherbert_v._Verner findlaw getcase.pl?navby=CASE&court=US&vol=374&page=398.
- Sherbert_v._Verner fullname "Sherbert v. Verner et al., Members of South Carolina Employment Security Commission, et al.".
- Sherbert_v._Verner hasPhotoCollection Sherbert_v._Verner.
- Sherbert_v._Verner holding "The Free Exercise Clause mandates strict scrutiny for unemployment compensation claims.".
- Sherbert_v._Verner joindissent "White".
- Sherbert_v._Verner justia case.html.
- Sherbert_v._Verner lawsapplied First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution.
- Sherbert_v._Verner lawsapplied Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution.
- Sherbert_v._Verner litigants "Sherbert v. Verner".
- Sherbert_v._Verner majority "Brennan".
- Sherbert_v._Verner prior "172800.0".
- Sherbert_v._Verner scotus "1962".
- Sherbert_v._Verner uspage "398".
- Sherbert_v._Verner usvol "374".
- Sherbert_v._Verner subject Category:1963_in_United_States_case_law.
- Sherbert_v._Verner subject Category:1963_in_religion.
- Sherbert_v._Verner subject Category:History_of_the_Seventh-day_Adventist_Church.
- Sherbert_v._Verner subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Sherbert_v._Verner subject Category:United_States_free_exercise_of_religion_case_law.
- Sherbert_v._Verner type Case.
- Sherbert_v._Verner type LegalCase.
- Sherbert_v._Verner type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Sherbert_v._Verner type UnitOfWork.
- Sherbert_v._Verner type Event.
- Sherbert_v._Verner type Situation.
- Sherbert_v._Verner comment "Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398 (1963), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment required that government demonstrate a compelling government interest before denying unemployment compensation to someone who was fired because their job conflicted with their religion.The case established the Sherbert Test, requiring demonstration of such a compelling interest in Free Exercise cases.".
- Sherbert_v._Verner label "Sherbert v. Verner".
- Sherbert_v._Verner sameAs m.0dlwpv.
- Sherbert_v._Verner sameAs Q7494708.
- Sherbert_v._Verner sameAs Q7494708.
- Sherbert_v._Verner wasDerivedFrom Sherbert_v._Verner?oldid=583569440.
- Sherbert_v._Verner isPrimaryTopicOf Sherbert_v._Verner.
- Sherbert_v._Verner name "Sherbert v. Verner et al., Members of South Carolina Employment Security Commission, et al.".