Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Solem_v._Bartlett> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 35 of
35
with 100 items per page.
- Solem_v._Bartlett abstract "Solem v. Bartlett, 465 U.S. 463, was 1984 a Supreme Court Case involving Indian country jurisdiction in the United States, in which the court decided that opening up reservation lands for settlement by non-Indians does not constitute the intent to diminish reservation boundaries. Therefore, reservation boundaries would not be diminished unless specifically determined through legislation.".
- Solem_v._Bartlett wikiPageExternalLink argument.
- Solem_v._Bartlett wikiPageID "24677541".
- Solem_v._Bartlett wikiPageRevisionID "532337702".
- Solem_v._Bartlett arguedate "--12-07".
- Solem_v._Bartlett argueyear "1984".
- Solem_v._Bartlett decidedate "--02-22".
- Solem_v._Bartlett decideyear "1984".
- Solem_v._Bartlett fullname "Solem v. Bartlett".
- Solem_v._Bartlett hasPhotoCollection Solem_v._Bartlett.
- Solem_v._Bartlett holding "Surplus Land Acts do not diminish reservations unless the act and its legislative history provide sufficient evidence of the intent to diminish.".
- Solem_v._Bartlett joinmajority "unanimous".
- Solem_v._Bartlett litigants "Solem v. Bartlett".
- Solem_v._Bartlett majority "Marshall".
- Solem_v._Bartlett oralargument argument.
- Solem_v._Bartlett scotus "1981".
- Solem_v._Bartlett uspage "463".
- Solem_v._Bartlett usvol "465".
- Solem_v._Bartlett subject Category:United_States_Native_American_case_law.
- Solem_v._Bartlett subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Solem_v._Bartlett subject Category:United_States_federal_Indian_policy.
- Solem_v._Bartlett type Case.
- Solem_v._Bartlett type LegalCase.
- Solem_v._Bartlett type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Solem_v._Bartlett type UnitOfWork.
- Solem_v._Bartlett type Event.
- Solem_v._Bartlett type Situation.
- Solem_v._Bartlett comment "Solem v. Bartlett, 465 U.S. 463, was 1984 a Supreme Court Case involving Indian country jurisdiction in the United States, in which the court decided that opening up reservation lands for settlement by non-Indians does not constitute the intent to diminish reservation boundaries. Therefore, reservation boundaries would not be diminished unless specifically determined through legislation.".
- Solem_v._Bartlett label "Solem v. Bartlett".
- Solem_v._Bartlett sameAs m.080q1d6.
- Solem_v._Bartlett sameAs Q17148622.
- Solem_v._Bartlett sameAs Q17148622.
- Solem_v._Bartlett wasDerivedFrom Solem_v._Bartlett?oldid=532337702.
- Solem_v._Bartlett isPrimaryTopicOf Solem_v._Bartlett.
- Solem_v._Bartlett name "Solem v. Bartlett".