Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Stinson_v._United_States> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 32 of
32
with 100 items per page.
- Stinson_v._United_States abstract "Stinson v. United States, 508 U.S. 36 (1993), is a decision of the United States Supreme Court, which held that commentary issued by the United States Sentencing Commission (which promulgates the United States Sentencing Guidelines), which interprets or explains a guideline is authoritative unless it violates the Constitution or a federal statute, or is inconsistent with, or a plainly erroneous reading of, that guideline. The Stinson decision has had broad influence having been cited in over 1,000 other federal appellate decisions, including both Blakely v. Washington (2004) and United States v. Booker (2005) the cases which rewrote federal guideline sentencing law. The Stinson decision has additionally been cited in over 3,700 appellate briefs and over 250 law reviews. The case was argued at the Supreme Court March 24, 1993 by William Mallory Kent on behalf of Stinson and Paul J. Larkin for the Solicitor General of the United States. The decision issued May 3, 1993, nine to zero for Stinson. With Mr. Larkin on the Solicitor General's brief were also Acting Solicitor General Bryson, Acting Assistant Attorney General John Keeney, and John F. DePue. Robert Augustus Harper filed a brief on behalf of the Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers as amicus curiae.".
- Stinson_v._United_States wikiPageID "15114722".
- Stinson_v._United_States wikiPageRevisionID "373257738".
- Stinson_v._United_States arguedate "--03-24".
- Stinson_v._United_States argueyear "1993".
- Stinson_v._United_States decidedate "--05-03".
- Stinson_v._United_States decideyear "1993".
- Stinson_v._United_States fullname "Terry Lynn Stinson, Petitioner v. United States".
- Stinson_v._United_States hasPhotoCollection Stinson_v._United_States.
- Stinson_v._United_States holding "The Guidelines Manual's commentary which interprets or explains a guideline is authoritative unless it violates the Constitution or a federal statute, or is inconsistent with, or a plainly erroneous reading of, that guideline.".
- Stinson_v._United_States joinmajority "unanimous".
- Stinson_v._United_States litigants "Stinson v. United States".
- Stinson_v._United_States majority "Kennedy".
- Stinson_v._United_States scotus "1991".
- Stinson_v._United_States uspage "36".
- Stinson_v._United_States usvol "508".
- Stinson_v._United_States subject Category:1993_in_United_States_case_law.
- Stinson_v._United_States subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Stinson_v._United_States type Case.
- Stinson_v._United_States type LegalCase.
- Stinson_v._United_States type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Stinson_v._United_States type UnitOfWork.
- Stinson_v._United_States type Event.
- Stinson_v._United_States type Situation.
- Stinson_v._United_States comment "Stinson v. United States, 508 U.S. 36 (1993), is a decision of the United States Supreme Court, which held that commentary issued by the United States Sentencing Commission (which promulgates the United States Sentencing Guidelines), which interprets or explains a guideline is authoritative unless it violates the Constitution or a federal statute, or is inconsistent with, or a plainly erroneous reading of, that guideline.".
- Stinson_v._United_States label "Stinson v. United States".
- Stinson_v._United_States sameAs m.03hhxwl.
- Stinson_v._United_States sameAs Q7617481.
- Stinson_v._United_States sameAs Q7617481.
- Stinson_v._United_States wasDerivedFrom Stinson_v._United_States?oldid=373257738.
- Stinson_v._United_States isPrimaryTopicOf Stinson_v._United_States.
- Stinson_v._United_States name "Terry Lynn Stinson, Petitioner v. United States".