Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Taus_v._Loftus> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 35 of
35
with 100 items per page.
- Taus_v._Loftus abstract "Taus v. Loftus, 151 P.3d 1185 (Cal. 2007) was a Supreme Court of California case in which the court held that academic researchers publication of information relating to a study by another researcher was newsworthy and subject to protection under the state's anti-SLAPP act. The court noted that the defendants had not disclosed the plaintiff's name and that Nicole Taus had disclosed it herself when she filed the case under her own name. The court did find that Taus had alleged a prima facie case that Loftus had misrepresented herself during the investigation and that this one count may proceed to trial.The case involved the initial research of David Corwin into child sexual abuse and repressed memory in 1997. Elizabeth F. Loftus and Melvin J. Guyer were skeptical of the research and investigated the claims that Corwin made. In 2002, Loftus and Guyer published the results of their inquiry, and Taus filed a defamation and invasion of privacy lawsuit the following year.After winning at the California Supreme Court, Taus settled with Loftus for minimal amount to avoid being liable for attorney fees. Taus remained liable for the attorney fees of the other defendants.".
- Taus_v._Loftus wikiPageID "36125372".
- Taus_v._Loftus wikiPageRevisionID "597354480".
- Taus_v._Loftus associatejudges Carlos_R._Moreno.
- Taus_v._Loftus associatejudges Carol_Corrigan.
- Taus_v._Loftus associatejudges Joyce_L._Kennard.
- Taus_v._Loftus associatejudges Kathryn_Werdegar.
- Taus_v._Loftus associatejudges Marvin_R._Baxter.
- Taus_v._Loftus associatejudges Ming_Chin.
- Taus_v._Loftus chiefjudge Ronald_M._George.
- Taus_v._Loftus citations "25920.0".
- Taus_v._Loftus dissent "Moreno, J.".
- Taus_v._Loftus decidedate "--02-26".
- Taus_v._Loftus decideyear "2007".
- Taus_v._Loftus fullname "Nicole Taus v. Elizabeth Loftus, et al.".
- Taus_v._Loftus hasPhotoCollection Taus_v._Loftus.
- Taus_v._Loftus holding "That defendants' course of conduct was in furtherance of free speech within meaning of anti-SLAPP statute; one author's public statements at conference about subject were “newsworthy,” and thus not actionable as public disclosure of private facts; statements at conference were privileged from defamation claim; author's use of subject initials in deposition in unrelated case was not actionable; defendants' conduct in obtaining court records was not actionable intrusion into private matters; and subject stated prima facie case of intrusion by alleging author obtained personal information by misrepresenting her association with author of original article.".
- Taus_v._Loftus dissent "Baxter, J.".
- Taus_v._Loftus joinmajority "Kennard, Werdegar, Chin, and Corrigan, JJ.".
- Taus_v._Loftus lawsapplied "Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 425.16".
- Taus_v._Loftus litigants "Taus v. Loftus".
- Taus_v._Loftus majority "George, C.J.".
- Taus_v._Loftus overruled "25920.0".
- Taus_v._Loftus prior "Unpublished, 2005 WL 737747".
- Taus_v._Loftus subject Category:2007_in_law.
- Taus_v._Loftus subject Category:California_state_case_law.
- Taus_v._Loftus subject Category:Strategic_lawsuits_against_public_participation.
- Taus_v._Loftus subject Category:United_States_tort_case_law.
- Taus_v._Loftus comment "Taus v. Loftus, 151 P.3d 1185 (Cal. 2007) was a Supreme Court of California case in which the court held that academic researchers publication of information relating to a study by another researcher was newsworthy and subject to protection under the state's anti-SLAPP act. The court noted that the defendants had not disclosed the plaintiff's name and that Nicole Taus had disclosed it herself when she filed the case under her own name.".
- Taus_v._Loftus label "Taus v. Loftus".
- Taus_v._Loftus sameAs m.0k0qs_c.
- Taus_v._Loftus sameAs Q7688937.
- Taus_v._Loftus sameAs Q7688937.
- Taus_v._Loftus wasDerivedFrom Taus_v._Loftus?oldid=597354480.
- Taus_v._Loftus isPrimaryTopicOf Taus_v._Loftus.