Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Wiggins_v._Smith> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 40 of
40
with 100 items per page.
- Wiggins_v._Smith abstract "Wiggins v. Smith, 539 U.S. 510 (2003) is a case in which the United States Supreme Court spelled out standards for "effectiveness" in the constitutional right to legal counsel guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment. Previously the court had determined that the Sixth Amendment included the right to "effective assistance" of legal counsel, but it did not specify what constitutes "effective", thus leaving the standards for effectiveness vague. In Wiggins v. Smith, the court set forth the American Bar Association Guidelines for the Appointment and Performance of Defense Counsel in Death Penalty Cases Guideline 11.8.6.(1989), as a specific guideline by which to measure effectiveness and competence of legal counsel.In Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), the Supreme Court set forth the factors the defendant must establish to demonstrate that counsel was ineffective. First, it must be shown that counsel's performance fell below an objective standard of reasonable competence, and second, if counsel had not been competent, that the trial outcome would likely have been different had the counsel been competent.".
- Wiggins_v._Smith wikiPageExternalLink WigginsS.htm.
- Wiggins_v._Smith wikiPageExternalLink 02-311.pdf.
- Wiggins_v._Smith wikiPageID "13684890".
- Wiggins_v._Smith wikiPageRevisionID "491873450".
- Wiggins_v._Smith arguedate "--03-24".
- Wiggins_v._Smith argueyear "2003".
- Wiggins_v._Smith decidedate "--06-26".
- Wiggins_v._Smith decideyear "2003".
- Wiggins_v._Smith dissent "Scalia".
- Wiggins_v._Smith fullname "Kevin Wiggins, Petitioner v. Sewall Smith, Warden, et al.".
- Wiggins_v._Smith hasPhotoCollection Wiggins_v._Smith.
- Wiggins_v._Smith holding "The performance of Wiggins' attorneys at sentencing violated his Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel.".
- Wiggins_v._Smith joindissent "Thomas".
- Wiggins_v._Smith joinmajority "Rehnquist, Stevens, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer".
- Wiggins_v._Smith litigants "Wiggins v. Smith".
- Wiggins_v._Smith majority "O'Connor".
- Wiggins_v._Smith oralargument 02-311.pdf.
- Wiggins_v._Smith scotus "1994".
- Wiggins_v._Smith uspage "510".
- Wiggins_v._Smith usvol "539".
- Wiggins_v._Smith subject Category:2003_in_United_States_case_law.
- Wiggins_v._Smith subject Category:2003_in_the_United_States.
- Wiggins_v._Smith subject Category:Mental_health_law_in_the_United_States.
- Wiggins_v._Smith subject Category:United_States_Sixth_Amendment_ineffective_assistance_of_counsel_case_law.
- Wiggins_v._Smith subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Wiggins_v._Smith type Case.
- Wiggins_v._Smith type LegalCase.
- Wiggins_v._Smith type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Wiggins_v._Smith type UnitOfWork.
- Wiggins_v._Smith type Event.
- Wiggins_v._Smith type Situation.
- Wiggins_v._Smith comment "Wiggins v. Smith, 539 U.S. 510 (2003) is a case in which the United States Supreme Court spelled out standards for "effectiveness" in the constitutional right to legal counsel guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment. Previously the court had determined that the Sixth Amendment included the right to "effective assistance" of legal counsel, but it did not specify what constitutes "effective", thus leaving the standards for effectiveness vague. In Wiggins v.".
- Wiggins_v._Smith label "Wiggins v. Smith".
- Wiggins_v._Smith sameAs m.03cf1nz.
- Wiggins_v._Smith sameAs Q7999598.
- Wiggins_v._Smith sameAs Q7999598.
- Wiggins_v._Smith wasDerivedFrom Wiggins_v._Smith?oldid=491873450.
- Wiggins_v._Smith isPrimaryTopicOf Wiggins_v._Smith.
- Wiggins_v._Smith name "Kevin Wiggins, Petitioner v. Sewall Smith, Warden, et al.".