Matches in ESWC 2020 for { ?s ?p ?o. }
- Paper.53_Review.0 creator Paper.53_Review.0_Reviewer.
- Paper.53_Review.0 hasRating ReviewRating.2.
- Paper.53_Review.0 hasReviewerConfidence ReviewerConfidence.4.
- Paper.53_Review.0 reviews Paper.53.
- Paper.53_Review.0 issuedAt easychair.org.
- Paper.53_Review.0 issuedFor Conference.
- Paper.53_Review.0 releasedBy Conference.
- Paper.53_Review.0 hasContent "After rebuttal: The authors have addressed most of my comments and now the vocabulary is available, so I decided to raise my score to accept. ************* This paper describes an approach to represent semantically study results so users can aggregate and compare them more efficiently; and an application to ease search, exploration and comparison of studies in the domain of human cooperation. The paper is well written, easy to follow and highly relevant for the conference in general and this track in particular. I also believe the topic is quite novel and with a lot of potential usefulness, as it could really be helpful to make researchers more efficient when comparing their work or exploring the state of the art. Therefore, I think the paper would be a nice addition to the conference, but I also felt like the approach was not completely mature. I discuss below some of the points that I think have room from improvement: - The vocabulary is listed as a contribution, but I tried to resolve http://data.coda.org/coda/vocab and I got a 404. - The paper claims to help on hypothesis generation, but this is not explained or demonstrated in the evaluation. I suggest removing such claims. - The authors state that reusing existing vocabularies was not within the scope of this early release. However, if the contribution is the semantic representation, this point needs to be addressed. Specifically because some of the terms have a very simple mapping to schema.org or the investigation, study, assay (ISA) model. https://isa-tools.org/ - Regarding the data model, I find very confusing that DOI and Paper are concepts described with the same properties. A DOI represents a paper, so I would have that as the paper identifier or import the DOI metadata and associate that to the paper. As it is, it can be interpreted that the title or author of a DOI is the title or author of the identifier, not the target paper. In addition, some properties seem to have been introduced just to define a hierarchy, to group subproperties under them (e.g., scholarly prop). If these properties do not have any semantics associated with them, it is often recommended to delete them from the ontology. Instead, you can define a category and add it as an annotation property. - I think that the paper will become really strong after the user-based evaluation is published. The formative evaluation presented is appropriate, but I would like to know more about how did the community converge on those 86 independent variables. This is often challenging, and I would like to see if there are guidelines from the community and how they reached consensus on those variables. - Some example SPARQL queries showing how to retrieve contents would really help understanding that data and the model behind it. - Where are the APIs used by the application? - Even though I understood the intent behind table 4, I don't quite understand the table itself: how is the information shown in another paper relevant to the studies assessed by the experts in this experiment? - How would one submit a custom visualization to the system? Cosmetic issues: - The paper gets at some point repetitive with contributions. I think that I have read them three times. And 'more automatically' does not sound correct to me. I would say "facilitate automation" or performing meta-analysis "semi-automatically" - There are a few typos, I recommend a proof read. In particular "softwares" is incorrect, instead use "software" or "software tools""".
- Paper.53_Review.1_Reviewer type RoleDuringEvent.
- Paper.53_Review.1_Reviewer label "Anonymous Reviewer for Paper 53".
- Paper.53_Review.1_Reviewer withRole ReviewerRole.
- Paper.53_Review.1_Reviewer withRole AnonymousReviewerRole.
- Paper.53_Review.1 type ReviewVersion.
- Paper.53_Review.1 issued "2001-01-14T08:23:00.000Z".
- Paper.53_Review.1 creator Paper.53_Review.1_Reviewer.
- Paper.53_Review.1 hasRating ReviewRating.2.
- Paper.53_Review.1 hasReviewerConfidence ReviewerConfidence.3.
- Paper.53_Review.1 reviews Paper.53.
- Paper.53_Review.1 issuedAt easychair.org.
- Paper.53_Review.1 issuedFor Conference.
- Paper.53_Review.1 releasedBy Conference.
- Paper.53_Review.1 hasContent "In this paper the authors develop a new approach that speeds up the redaction of systematic reviews. The authors perform their exercise on a particular case: a dataset reporting experiments in the field of social and behavioural science. The authors first convert their dataset in knowledge graph, using their own model, and then they design a web interface that allows to explore this data through several facets. The effects of such semanticisation definitely benefits the whole workflow. The paper is well written and easy to understand. The evaluation is sound, although I would have very much welcomed a more qualitative evaluation with few researchers. However, I must admit that such evaluation requires a different planning as you will need researchers to perform an actual systematic review. Minor issue: Page 11, there is a disalignment between Fig4d and Fig4e and when referenced in the text."".
- Paper.55 type SubmissionsPaper.
- Paper.55 label "DSRL:Knowledge Representation Learning with Structural and Descriptive Modeling".
- Paper.55 title "DSRL:Knowledge Representation Learning with Structural and Descriptive Modeling".
- Paper.55 issued "2001-12-03T10:10:00.000Z".
- Paper.55 authorList b0_g144.
- Paper.55 submission Paper.55.
- Paper.55 track Track.Knowledge%20Graphs.
- b0_g144 first Author.55.1.
- b0_g144 rest b0_g145.
- Author.55.1 type RoleDuringEvent.
- Author.55.1 label "Maoyuan Zhang, 1st Author for Paper 55".
- Author.55.1 withRole PublishingRole.
- Author.55.1 isHeldBy Maoyuan_Zhang.
- b0_g145 first Author.55.2.
- b0_g145 rest b0_g146.
- Author.55.2 type RoleDuringEvent.
- Author.55.2 label "Yang Wen, 2nd Author for Paper 55".
- Author.55.2 withRole PublishingRole.
- Author.55.2 isHeldBy Yang_Wen.
- b0_g146 first Author.55.3.
- b0_g146 rest nil.
- Author.55.3 type RoleDuringEvent.
- Author.55.3 label "Liquan Zhou, 3rd Author for Paper 55".
- Author.55.3 withRole PublishingRole.
- Author.55.3 isHeldBy Liquan_Zhou.
- Maoyuan_Zhang type Person.
- Maoyuan_Zhang name "Maoyuan Zhang".
- Maoyuan_Zhang label "Maoyuan Zhang".
- Maoyuan_Zhang holdsRole Author.55.1.
- Yang_Wen type Person.
- Yang_Wen name "Yang Wen".
- Yang_Wen label "Yang Wen".
- Yang_Wen holdsRole Author.55.2.
- Liquan_Zhou type Person.
- Liquan_Zhou name "Liquan Zhou".
- Liquan_Zhou label "Liquan Zhou".
- Liquan_Zhou holdsRole Author.55.3.
- Paper.56 type SubmissionsPaper.
- Paper.56 label "Approach for developing engineering tools based on Knowledge Graphs to find new ways to speedup top level engineering processes".
- Paper.56 title "Approach for developing engineering tools based on Knowledge Graphs to find new ways to speedup top level engineering processes".
- Paper.56 issued "2001-12-03T10:42:00.000Z".
- Paper.56 authorList b0_g147.
- Paper.56 submission Paper.56.
- Paper.56 track Track.Knowledge%20Graphs.
- b0_g147 first Author.56.1.
- b0_g147 rest b0_g148.
- Author.56.1 type RoleDuringEvent.
- Author.56.1 label "Nikita Debelov, 1st Author for Paper 56".
- Author.56.1 withRole PublishingRole.
- Author.56.1 isHeldBy Nikita_Debelov.
- b0_g148 first Author.56.2.
- b0_g148 rest b0_g149.
- Author.56.2 type RoleDuringEvent.
- Author.56.2 label "Petr Mukhachev, 2nd Author for Paper 56".
- Author.56.2 withRole PublishingRole.
- Author.56.2 isHeldBy Petr_Mukhachev.
- b0_g149 first Author.56.3.
- b0_g149 rest nil.
- Author.56.3 type RoleDuringEvent.
- Author.56.3 label "Anton Ivanov, 3rd Author for Paper 56".
- Author.56.3 withRole PublishingRole.
- Author.56.3 isHeldBy Anton_Ivanov.
- Nikita_Debelov type Person.
- Nikita_Debelov name "Nikita Debelov".
- Nikita_Debelov label "Nikita Debelov".
- Nikita_Debelov holdsRole Author.56.1.
- Petr_Mukhachev type Person.
- Petr_Mukhachev name "Petr Mukhachev".
- Petr_Mukhachev label "Petr Mukhachev".
- Petr_Mukhachev holdsRole Author.56.2.
- Anton_Ivanov type Person.
- Anton_Ivanov name "Anton Ivanov".
- Anton_Ivanov label "Anton Ivanov".
- Anton_Ivanov holdsRole Author.56.3.
- Paper.58 type SubmissionsPaper.
- Paper.58 label "A Framework of Threshold Value Discovery for Ontology Matching Algorithm".
- Paper.58 title "A Framework of Threshold Value Discovery for Ontology Matching Algorithm".
- Paper.58 issued "2001-12-03T11:25:00.000Z".