Matches in Harvard for { <http://id.lib.harvard.edu/aleph/002570369/catalog> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 25 of
25
with 100 items per page.
- catalog contributor b3725060.
- catalog created "[1966]".
- catalog date "1966".
- catalog date "[1966]".
- catalog dateCopyrighted "[1966]".
- catalog description "Bibliography: p. 293-299.".
- catalog description "I. First principles of divine ethics -- A. God's holiness, truth, and love -- B. What is sin? -- 1. Sin is not a negative conception -- 2. Sin is not an illusion -- 3. Sin is not sensuousness -- 4. Sin is more than selfishness -- 5. Sin is a purely spiritual affair -- 6. Sin is lawlessness, disobedience to God -- 7. Sin is a moral evil, but not all evil is sin -- C. Why is man disinherited, depraved, and lost? -- II. Facts of revelation about original sin -- A. Born in sin -- B. Ceremonial expiation for birth-sin -- C. Sons of disobedience, children of wrath, etc. -- D. Children of the devil -- E. Total depravity -- F. The question of inherited sin".
- catalog description "III. Sin and evil in relation to God's purpose -- A. Why did God create the world? -- B. The problem of time and eternity -- C. How can God know what free moral agents will do? -- D. Why did God permit sin? -- 1. Views of Joseph Bellamy -- 2. Views of Samuel Hopkins -- 3. Views of Leonard Woods -- 4. Views of Bennet Tyler -- 5. Views of Nathanael W. Taylor -- 6. Views of Edwards A. Park -- 7. Views of The Quarterly Christian Spectator -- 8. Views of a Christian physician -- E. The problem of dysteleology -- F. The relation between God and moral evil -- 1. External dualism -- 2. Internal dualism -- 3. Predestinarianism -- 4. Ethical orthodoxy -- G. Origin of sin and evil -- H. The creation subjected to vanity -- I. The moral test -- IV. The fall of man -- A. A fall before the fall -- B. The mission of Adam and Eve -- C. The talking serpent -- D. The tree of life -- E. The tree of the knowledge of good and evil -- F. Were Adam and Eve created perfect? -- G. Did man fall up or down? -- H. Was the fall of man an unmitigated evil? -- I. Why did sinless beings sin? -- J. Does being tempted lessen responsibility? -- K. Was Eve to blame for being deceived? -- L. Was the fall a progression or a plunge? -- M. The triviality of the original sin -- N. Man's ability to withstand Satan -- O. Is the story of Adam and Eve true to life?".
- catalog description "V. Theories of depravity by divine ordination-realism -- A. Our connection with the original sinner -- B. Realism-the Augustinian theory -- C. Objections to the Augustinian theory -- 1. Realism a false, outmoded philosophy -- 2. A false conception of human nature -- 3. A false conception of sin -- 4. A false conception of guilt, blame, and moral responsibility -- 5. Cannot explain why we are responsible for the first sin and not or any others -- 6. Attributes original sin to divine ordination -- VI. Theories of depravity by divine ordination-representation -- A. Representation: the federal headship theory -- B. The three imputations of federalism -- C. Relation between the two headships of Adam -- D. the ethics and theodicy of federalism -- E. Federalism justifying itself -- 1. Representation a valid principle -- 2. The parallelism of Romans 5:12-21 -- 3. God is not the cause of sin -- 4. No other way to sin in Adam -- 5. Imputation offset by redemption -- 6. Probation by proxy -- VII. Theories of depravity by divine ordination (concluded) -- A. Scientia Media Dei: condemnation by sample -- B. Depravity by direct divine constitution -- 1. Jonathan Edward's theory of identity -- 2. Samuel Hopkins: a divine constitution -- 3. Nathanael Emmons: a consistent system of divine efficiency -- 4. The first cause of sin -- C. Desperate ways of escape -- 1. Charles Chauncy's universalism -- 2. Dumping the whole problem overboard".
- catalog description "VIII. Theories of depravity by natural inheritance -- A. The genetic mode in Calvinism -- B. Imputation: mediate or immediate? -- C. Inherited depravity without guilt -- 1. Semi-Pelagianism and Arminianism -- 2. The Wesleyan doctrine of original sin -- .a The Wesleyan conception of total depravity -- b. The Wesleyan conception of guilt -- c. Imputation and transmission of guilt -- d. Infant guilt and depravity -- e. Criticism of the Wesleyan theory -- 3. The new school theory of original sin -- 4. Objections to the new school theory -- a. Condemnation without a trial -- b. Lack of connection between our sin and Adam's -- 3. Theodicy breaks down -- 4. False conception of sin -- 5. False conception of the soul -- 6. Destroys human responsibility -- D. Evolutionary theories of sin -- E. Objections to the evolutionary theories -- 1. Destroy human freedom and responsibility -- 2. Make God the author of sin -- 3. Failure to account for the sense of guilt -- 4. Fail to account for the origin of sin -- 5. Deny the veracity -- IX. Theories of depravity by self-determination.".
- catalog extent "xix, 311 p.".
- catalog issued "1966".
- catalog issued "[1966]".
- catalog language "eng".
- catalog publisher "New York, Philosophical Library".
- catalog subject "233.14".
- catalog subject "BT720 .B78".
- catalog subject "Fall of man.".
- catalog subject "Sin, Original.".
- catalog tableOfContents "I. First principles of divine ethics -- A. God's holiness, truth, and love -- B. What is sin? -- 1. Sin is not a negative conception -- 2. Sin is not an illusion -- 3. Sin is not sensuousness -- 4. Sin is more than selfishness -- 5. Sin is a purely spiritual affair -- 6. Sin is lawlessness, disobedience to God -- 7. Sin is a moral evil, but not all evil is sin -- C. Why is man disinherited, depraved, and lost? -- II. Facts of revelation about original sin -- A. Born in sin -- B. Ceremonial expiation for birth-sin -- C. Sons of disobedience, children of wrath, etc. -- D. Children of the devil -- E. Total depravity -- F. The question of inherited sin".
- catalog tableOfContents "III. Sin and evil in relation to God's purpose -- A. Why did God create the world? -- B. The problem of time and eternity -- C. How can God know what free moral agents will do? -- D. Why did God permit sin? -- 1. Views of Joseph Bellamy -- 2. Views of Samuel Hopkins -- 3. Views of Leonard Woods -- 4. Views of Bennet Tyler -- 5. Views of Nathanael W. Taylor -- 6. Views of Edwards A. Park -- 7. Views of The Quarterly Christian Spectator -- 8. Views of a Christian physician -- E. The problem of dysteleology -- F. The relation between God and moral evil -- 1. External dualism -- 2. Internal dualism -- 3. Predestinarianism -- 4. Ethical orthodoxy -- G. Origin of sin and evil -- H. The creation subjected to vanity -- I. The moral test -- IV. The fall of man -- A. A fall before the fall -- B. The mission of Adam and Eve -- C. The talking serpent -- D. The tree of life -- E. The tree of the knowledge of good and evil -- F. Were Adam and Eve created perfect? -- G. Did man fall up or down? -- H. Was the fall of man an unmitigated evil? -- I. Why did sinless beings sin? -- J. Does being tempted lessen responsibility? -- K. Was Eve to blame for being deceived? -- L. Was the fall a progression or a plunge? -- M. The triviality of the original sin -- N. Man's ability to withstand Satan -- O. Is the story of Adam and Eve true to life?".
- catalog tableOfContents "V. Theories of depravity by divine ordination-realism -- A. Our connection with the original sinner -- B. Realism-the Augustinian theory -- C. Objections to the Augustinian theory -- 1. Realism a false, outmoded philosophy -- 2. A false conception of human nature -- 3. A false conception of sin -- 4. A false conception of guilt, blame, and moral responsibility -- 5. Cannot explain why we are responsible for the first sin and not or any others -- 6. Attributes original sin to divine ordination -- VI. Theories of depravity by divine ordination-representation -- A. Representation: the federal headship theory -- B. The three imputations of federalism -- C. Relation between the two headships of Adam -- D. the ethics and theodicy of federalism -- E. Federalism justifying itself -- 1. Representation a valid principle -- 2. The parallelism of Romans 5:12-21 -- 3. God is not the cause of sin -- 4. No other way to sin in Adam -- 5. Imputation offset by redemption -- 6. Probation by proxy -- VII. Theories of depravity by divine ordination (concluded) -- A. Scientia Media Dei: condemnation by sample -- B. Depravity by direct divine constitution -- 1. Jonathan Edward's theory of identity -- 2. Samuel Hopkins: a divine constitution -- 3. Nathanael Emmons: a consistent system of divine efficiency -- 4. The first cause of sin -- C. Desperate ways of escape -- 1. Charles Chauncy's universalism -- 2. Dumping the whole problem overboard".
- catalog tableOfContents "VIII. Theories of depravity by natural inheritance -- A. The genetic mode in Calvinism -- B. Imputation: mediate or immediate? -- C. Inherited depravity without guilt -- 1. Semi-Pelagianism and Arminianism -- 2. The Wesleyan doctrine of original sin -- .a The Wesleyan conception of total depravity -- b. The Wesleyan conception of guilt -- c. Imputation and transmission of guilt -- d. Infant guilt and depravity -- e. Criticism of the Wesleyan theory -- 3. The new school theory of original sin -- 4. Objections to the new school theory -- a. Condemnation without a trial -- b. Lack of connection between our sin and Adam's -- 3. Theodicy breaks down -- 4. False conception of sin -- 5. False conception of the soul -- 6. Destroys human responsibility -- D. Evolutionary theories of sin -- E. Objections to the evolutionary theories -- 1. Destroy human freedom and responsibility -- 2. Make God the author of sin -- 3. Failure to account for the sense of guilt -- 4. Fail to account for the origin of sin -- 5. Deny the veracity -- IX. Theories of depravity by self-determination.".
- catalog title "Children of the Devil; a fresh investigation of the fall of man and original sin, by William T. Bruner.".
- catalog type "text".