Data Portal @ linkeddatafragments.org

Matches in LOV for { ?s <http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/IAO_0000116> ?o. }

• IAO_0000003 IAO_0000116 "2009-03-16: provenance: a term measurement unit was\nproposed for OBI (OBI_0000176) , edited by Chris Stoeckert and\nCristian Cocos, and subsequently moved to IAO where the objective for\nwhich the original term was defined was satisfied with the definition\nof this, different, term.".
• IAO_0000003 IAO_0000116 "2009-03-16: review of this term done during during the OBI workshop winter 2009 and the current definition was considered acceptable for use in OBI. If there is a need to modify this definition please notify OBI.".
• IAO_0000005 IAO_0000116 "Answers the question, why did you do this experiment?".
• IAO_0000009 IAO_0000116 "http://www.golovchenko.org/cgi-bin/wnsearch?q=label#4n".
• IAO_0000027 IAO_0000116 "2/2/2009 Alan and Bjoern discussing FACS run output data. This is a data item because it is about the cell population. Each element records an event and is typically further composed a set of measurment data items that record the fluorescent intensity stimulated by one of the lasers.".
• IAO_0000027 IAO_0000116 "2009-03-16: data item deliberatly ambiguous: we merged data set and datum to be one entity, not knowing how to define singular versus plural. So data item is more general than datum.".
• IAO_0000027 IAO_0000116 "2009-03-16: removed datum as alternative term as datum specifically refers to singular form, and is thus not an exact synonym.".
• IAO_0000027 IAO_0000116 "JAR: datum -- well, this will be very tricky to define, but maybe some \ninformation-like stuff that might be put into a computer and that is \nmeant, by someone, to denote and/or to be interpreted by some \nprocess... I would include lists, tables, sentences... I think I might \ndefer to Barry, or to Brian Cantwell Smith\n\nJAR: A data item is an approximately justified approximately true approximate belief".
• IAO_0000030 IAO_0000116 "information_content_entity 'is_encoded_in' some digital_entity in obi before split (040907). information_content_entity 'is_encoded_in' some physical_document in obi before split (040907).\n\nPrevious. An information content entity is a non-realizable information entity that 'is encoded in' some digital or physical entity.".
• IAO_0000032 IAO_0000116 "2009-03-16: we decided to keep datum singular in scalar measurement datum, as in\nthis case we explicitly refer to the singular form".
• IAO_0000032 IAO_0000116 "Would write this as: has_part some 'measurement unit label' and has_part some numeral and has_part exactly 2, except for the fact that this won't let us take advantage of OWL reasoning over the numbers. Instead use has measurment value property to represent the same. Use has measurement unit label (subproperty of has_part) so we can easily say that there is only one of them.".
• IAO_0000033 IAO_0000116 "8/6/2009 Alan Ruttenberg: Changed label from \"information entity about a realizable\" after discussions at ICBO".
• IAO_0000033 IAO_0000116 "Werner pushed back on calling it realizable information entity as it isn't realizable. However this name isn't right either. An example would be a recipe. The realizable entity would be a plan, but the information entity isn't about the plan, it, once concretized, *is* the plan. -Alan".
• IAO_0000104 IAO_0000116 "2009-03-16: provenance: a term a plan was proposed for OBI (OBI_0000344) , edited by the PlanAndPlannedProcess branch. Original definition was \" a plan is a specification of a process that is realized by an actor to achieve the objective specified as part of the plan\". It has been subsequently moved to IAO where the objective for which the original term was defined was satisfied with the definitionof this, different, term.".
• IAO_0000104 IAO_0000116 "Alternative previous definition: a plan is a set of instructions that specify how an objective should be achieved".
• IAO_0000109 IAO_0000116 "2/2/2009 is_specified_output of some assay?".
• IAO_0000136 IAO_0000116 "7/6/2009 Alan Ruttenberg. Following discussion with Jonathan Rees, and introduction of \"mentions\" relation. Weaken the is_about relationship to be primitive. \n\nWe will try to build it back up by elaborating the various subproperties that are more precisely defined.\n\nSome currently missing phenomena that should be considered \"about\" are predications - \"The only person who knows the answer is sitting beside me\" , Allegory, Satire, and other literary forms that can be topical without explicitly mentioning the topic.".
• IAO_0000221 IAO_0000116 "8/6/2009 Alan Ruttenberg: The strategy is to be rather specific with this relationship. There are other kinds of measurements that are not of qualities, such as those that measure time. We will add these as separate properties for the moment and see about generalizing later".
• IAO_0000221 IAO_0000116 "From the second IAO workshop [Alan Ruttenberg 8/6/2009: not completely current, though bringing in comparison is probably important]\n\nThis one is the one we are struggling with at the moment. The issue is what a measurement measures. On the one hand saying that it measures the quality would include it \"measuring\" the bearer = referring to the bearer in the measurement. However this makes comparisons of two different things not possible. On the other hand not having it inhere in the bearer, on the face of it, breaks the audit trail.\n\nWerner suggests a solution based on \"Magnitudes\" a proposal for which we are awaiting details.\n--\nFrom the second IAO workshop, various comments, [commented on by Alan Ruttenberg 8/6/2009]\n\nunit of measure is a quality, e.g. the length of a ruler.\n\n[We decided to hedge on what units of measure are, instead talking about measurement unit labels, which are the information content entities that are about whatever measurement units are. For IAO we need that information entity in any case. See the term measurement unit label]\n\n[Some struggling with the various subflavors of is_about. We subsequently removed the relation represents, and describes until and only when we have a better theory]\n\na represents b means either a denotes b or a describes\n\ndescribe:\na describes b means a is about b and a allows an inference of at least one quality of b\n\nWe have had a long discussion about denotes versus describes.".
• IAO_0000221 IAO_0000116 "From the second IAO workshop: An attempt at tieing the quality to the measurement datum more carefully.\n\na is a magnitude means a is a determinate quality particular inhering in some bearer b existing at a time t that can be represented/denoted by an information content entity e that has parts denoting a unit of measure, a number, and b. The unit of measure is an instance of the determinable quality.".
• IAO_0000221 IAO_0000116 "From the second meeting on IAO:\n\nAn attempt at defining assay using Barry's \"reliability\" wording\n\nassay:\nprocess and has_input some material entity\nand has_output some information content entity \nand which is such that instances of this process type reliably generate \noutputs that describes the input.".
• IAO_0000221 IAO_0000116 "This one is the one we are struggling with at the moment. The issue is what a measurement measures. On the one hand saying that it measures the quality would include it \"measuring\" the bearer = referring to the bearer in the measurement. However this makes comparisons of two different things not possible. On the other hand not having it inhere in the bearer, on the face of it, breaks the audit trail.\n\nWerner suggests a solution based on \"Magnitudes\" a proposal for which we are awaiting details.".
• OBI_0000011 IAO_0000116 "'Plan' includes a future direction sense. That can be problematic if plans are changed during their execution. There are however implicit contingencies for protocols that an agent has in his mind that can be considered part of the plan, even if the agent didn't have them in mind before. Therefore, a planned process can diverge from what the agent would have said the plan was before executing it, by adjusting to problems encountered during execution (e.g. choosing another reagent with equivalent properties, if the originally planned one has run out.)".
• IAO_0000144 IAO_0000116 "2009/09/28 Alan Ruttenberg. Fucoidan-use-case".
• IAO_0000144 IAO_0000116 "2009/10/23 Alan Ruttenberg: We need to work on the definition still".
• IAO_0000300 IAO_0000116 "AR, (IAO call 2009-09-01): a document as a whole is not typically a textual entity, because it has pictures in it - rather there are parts of it that are textual entities. Examples: The title, paragraph 2 sentence 7, etc.".
• IAO_0000300 IAO_0000116 "MC, 2009-09-14 (following IAO call 2009-09-01): textual entities live at the FRBR (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Functional_Requirements_for_Bibliographic_Records) manifestation level. Everything is significant: line break, pdf and html versions of same document are different textual entities.".
• IAO_0000417 IAO_0000116 "2009/10/19 Alan Ruttenberg. Named 'junk' relation useful in restrictions, but not a real instance relationship".
• OBI_0000293 IAO_0000116 "8/17/09: specified inputs of one process are not necessarily specified inputs of a larger process that it is part of. This is in contrast to how 'has participant' works.".
• OBI_0000643 IAO_0000116 "Discussion in Karslruhe with, among others, Alan Rector, Stefan Schulz, Marijke Keet, Melanie Courtot, and Alan Ruttenberg. Definition take from the definition of granular parthood in the cited paper. Needs work to put into standard form".
• OBI_0000833 IAO_0000116 "definition needs clean up to indicate directionality".
• RO_0000052 IAO_0000116 "This clarifies that only specifically dependent continuants inhere in (specifically) one independent continuant over all time. For GDCs, there in implicitly inherence to all the independent continuants in which the concretizations inhere. Should add a 'cardinality 1' restriction to the definition of specifically dependent continuant.".
• RO_0000052 IAO_0000116 "This relation belongs in BFO/RO, and will be in BFO 2".