Matches in ScholarlyData for { <https://w3id.org/scholarlydata/inproceedings/eswc2008/paper/346> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 20 of
20
with 100 items per page.
- 346 creator antoine-isaac.
- 346 creator guus-schreiber.
- 346 creator laura-hollink.
- 346 creator mark-van-assem.
- 346 creator shenghui-wang.
- 346 type InProceedings.
- 346 label "Two Variations on Ontology Alignment Evaluation: Methodological Issues".
- 346 sameAs 346.
- 346 abstract "Evaluation of ontology alignments is in practice done in two ways: (1) assessing individual correspondences and (2) comparing the alignment to a reference alignment. However, this type of evaluation does not guarantee that an application which uses the alignment will perform well. In this paper, we contribute to the current ontology alignment evaluation practices by proposing two alternative evaluation methods that take into account some characteristics of a usage scenario without doing a full-fledged end-to-end evaluation. We compare different evaluation approaches in three case studies, focussing on methodological issues. Each case study considers an alignment between a different pair of ontologies, ranging from rich and well-structured to small and poorly structured. This enables us to conclude on the use of different evaluation approaches in different settings.".
- 346 hasAuthorList authorList.
- 346 hasTopic Ontology_%28computer_science%29.
- 346 hasTopic Ontology_alignment.
- 346 hasTopic Semantic_Web.
- 346 isPartOf proceedings.
- 346 keyword "cultural heritage retrieval".
- 346 keyword "end-to-end evaluation".
- 346 keyword "evaluation methods".
- 346 keyword "ontology alignment".
- 346 keyword "semantic distance".
- 346 title "Two Variations on Ontology Alignment Evaluation: Methodological Issues".