Matches in Ghent University Academic Bibliography for { <https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/01GJCSTW415BKS2RAF9ZGZG65G> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 27 of
27
with 100 items per page.
- 01GJCSTW415BKS2RAF9ZGZG65G classification A1.
- 01GJCSTW415BKS2RAF9ZGZG65G date "2023".
- 01GJCSTW415BKS2RAF9ZGZG65G language "eng".
- 01GJCSTW415BKS2RAF9ZGZG65G type journalArticle.
- 01GJCSTW415BKS2RAF9ZGZG65G hasPart 01GJCSX7Q6ZDHGG0EKCJHDCF0Z.pdf.
- 01GJCSTW415BKS2RAF9ZGZG65G subject "Medicine and Health Sciences".
- 01GJCSTW415BKS2RAF9ZGZG65G doi "10.1016/j.jtv.2022.11.002".
- 01GJCSTW415BKS2RAF9ZGZG65G issn "0965-206X".
- 01GJCSTW415BKS2RAF9ZGZG65G issn "1876-4746".
- 01GJCSTW415BKS2RAF9ZGZG65G issue "1".
- 01GJCSTW415BKS2RAF9ZGZG65G volume "32".
- 01GJCSTW415BKS2RAF9ZGZG65G abstract "Purpose: To systematically summarize and review the existing literature to determine the difference between wound cleansing techniques, irrigation and swabbing, in relation to bleeding, pain, infection, necrotic tissue and exudate in non-infected chronic wounds including pressure injuries, venous and arterial leg ulcers and diabetic foot ulcers.Methods: A systematic search of the electronic databases Ovid Medline, Cochrane Database of Systematic Re-views, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and EMBASE was performed to identify all relevant literature in English. The search also included systematic reviews as a method to obtain additional potential citations by manually searching the reference lists. Included studies were assessed for methodological quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.Results: One study met eligibility criteria. Two hundred fifty six patients with wounds healing via secondary intention (n symbolscript 256) were included. Wound cleansing via swabbing technique was associated with increased perception of pain and increased rates of infection when compared to the irrigation group (93.4% versus 84.2% p symbolscript 0.02 and 5.2% versus 3.3% p symbolscript 0.44, respectively). Only a small proportion of this sample met the inclusion criteria, so the results are not considered externally valid.Conclusion: Wound cleansing remains a controversial topic. Despite calls for further research, there continues to remain a large gap in evidence to guide practice. Irrigation continues to replace swabbing in the management of chronic wounds, although evidence of improved outcomes is virtually nonexistent. Although the one study identified was of sound methodological quality, chronic wounds accounted for only a small percentage of the sample. Therefore, results are not generalizable to those with chronic wounds. Further research is needed to determine the effectiveness of basic wound cleansing techniques before considering more costly products.".
- 01GJCSTW415BKS2RAF9ZGZG65G author FA328522-F0ED-11E1-A9DE-61C894A0A6B4.
- 01GJCSTW415BKS2RAF9ZGZG65G author urn:uuid:1c4ed121-21ba-4939-934c-870a2189b4f2.
- 01GJCSTW415BKS2RAF9ZGZG65G author urn:uuid:2da9d113-0e2e-4580-918e-859bf32e6041.
- 01GJCSTW415BKS2RAF9ZGZG65G author urn:uuid:415521aa-f216-4c72-a1a2-204f69f524c4.
- 01GJCSTW415BKS2RAF9ZGZG65G author urn:uuid:6fb24919-e2e0-4359-9b36-1a3b43d186fd.
- 01GJCSTW415BKS2RAF9ZGZG65G author urn:uuid:8b2b94a2-a066-497e-ac57-c4a10e54f7e7.
- 01GJCSTW415BKS2RAF9ZGZG65G author urn:uuid:f1574ee4-107c-4b66-b570-33cbd144f47e.
- 01GJCSTW415BKS2RAF9ZGZG65G dateCreated "2022-11-21T09:55:42Z".
- 01GJCSTW415BKS2RAF9ZGZG65G dateModified "2024-12-12T17:54:20Z".
- 01GJCSTW415BKS2RAF9ZGZG65G name "Wound irrigation versus swabbing technique for cleansing noninfected chronic wounds : a systematic review of differences in bleeding, pain, infection, exudate, and necrotic tissue".
- 01GJCSTW415BKS2RAF9ZGZG65G pagination urn:uuid:098576a9-3630-4f28-b53d-95bedb6fe9df.
- 01GJCSTW415BKS2RAF9ZGZG65G publisher urn:uuid:8b6a5524-5c2d-4b00-8cf7-8be7dcc7e7b0.
- 01GJCSTW415BKS2RAF9ZGZG65G sameAs LU-01GJCSTW415BKS2RAF9ZGZG65G.
- 01GJCSTW415BKS2RAF9ZGZG65G sourceOrganization urn:uuid:12dbe893-9c0b-4929-937f-a7f3b1a4e028.
- 01GJCSTW415BKS2RAF9ZGZG65G type A1.