Matches in Ghent University Academic Bibliography for { <https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/01GMVB4PHXSW6K3Y64RWJXRJKR> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 19 of
19
with 100 items per page.
- 01GMVB4PHXSW6K3Y64RWJXRJKR classification C3.
- 01GMVB4PHXSW6K3Y64RWJXRJKR date "2022".
- 01GMVB4PHXSW6K3Y64RWJXRJKR language "eng".
- 01GMVB4PHXSW6K3Y64RWJXRJKR type conference.
- 01GMVB4PHXSW6K3Y64RWJXRJKR hasPart 01GMX59RY1NQP37ZS4YZ3Q171K.pdf.
- 01GMVB4PHXSW6K3Y64RWJXRJKR subject "Technology and Engineering".
- 01GMVB4PHXSW6K3Y64RWJXRJKR doi "10.5281/zenodo.7405597".
- 01GMVB4PHXSW6K3Y64RWJXRJKR presentedAt urn:uuid:09dbe5a1-626c-4c49-832b-83147b0fe0f1.
- 01GMVB4PHXSW6K3Y64RWJXRJKR abstract "The existing building stock is outdated, consumes a lot of energy, and is a major contributor to the global greenhouse gas emissions. Consequently, there is an urgent need for a transition of the existing building stock towards energy and carbon neutral buildings. There are three main pathways that could facilitate this transition: one-step deep energy renovation, step-by-step deep energy renovation, and demolition followed by new build. The importance of a sustainable transition, however, raises the question of how the environmental impact and financial cost of these three main pathways relate for different types of single-family dwellings. Several researchers have already searched for decision-making methods that integrate Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Life Cycle Costing (LCC) to assess both environmental impacts and financial costs. However, a systematic comparison of the three pathways is lacking. Moreover, existing standards on how to perform an LCA are very conceptual and too vague to allow for a fair and consistent comparison of the three main pathways. This leaves a lot of freedom to LCA practitioners to make assumptions, implement simplifications and set their own boundary conditions. This can contribute to variations and contradictions in the trade-off between the pathways. This research project, therefore, aims to develop a well-defined and robust methodological LCA framework to compare the three main pathways in a fair and consistent way, provide insight into which pathways are most optimal for different types of single-family dwellings, and determine tipping points in the trade-off between the pathways to define more tangible and general building renovation guidelines.".
- 01GMVB4PHXSW6K3Y64RWJXRJKR author 8ED73DCE-14E4-11E3-822E-DD8B10BDE39D.
- 01GMVB4PHXSW6K3Y64RWJXRJKR author F7B24E40-F0ED-11E1-A9DE-61C894A0A6B4.
- 01GMVB4PHXSW6K3Y64RWJXRJKR author F822C864-F0ED-11E1-A9DE-61C894A0A6B4.
- 01GMVB4PHXSW6K3Y64RWJXRJKR dateCreated "2022-12-21T21:58:56Z".
- 01GMVB4PHXSW6K3Y64RWJXRJKR dateModified "2024-07-09T07:42:24Z".
- 01GMVB4PHXSW6K3Y64RWJXRJKR name "Renovate in one step, stepwise, or reconstruct?".
- 01GMVB4PHXSW6K3Y64RWJXRJKR pagination urn:uuid:f06cc5a3-0199-460f-bae5-237a97759291.
- 01GMVB4PHXSW6K3Y64RWJXRJKR sameAs LU-01GMVB4PHXSW6K3Y64RWJXRJKR.
- 01GMVB4PHXSW6K3Y64RWJXRJKR sourceOrganization urn:uuid:27438ebb-1982-4ccd-9ff1-d7f9f7e1bc0f.
- 01GMVB4PHXSW6K3Y64RWJXRJKR type C3.