Matches in Ghent University Academic Bibliography for { <https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/01HEWNRFFYH2950D7F6YQHGDW6> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 26 of
26
with 100 items per page.
- 01HEWNRFFYH2950D7F6YQHGDW6 classification C1.
- 01HEWNRFFYH2950D7F6YQHGDW6 date "2023".
- 01HEWNRFFYH2950D7F6YQHGDW6 language "eng".
- 01HEWNRFFYH2950D7F6YQHGDW6 type conference.
- 01HEWNRFFYH2950D7F6YQHGDW6 hasPart 01HEWNXJ0TF6H89M14D1Q74YWW.pdf.
- 01HEWNRFFYH2950D7F6YQHGDW6 subject "Earth and Environmental Sciences".
- 01HEWNRFFYH2950D7F6YQHGDW6 subject "Technology and Engineering".
- 01HEWNRFFYH2950D7F6YQHGDW6 doi "10.1063/5.0172463".
- 01HEWNRFFYH2950D7F6YQHGDW6 issn "0094-243X".
- 01HEWNRFFYH2950D7F6YQHGDW6 issn "1551-7616".
- 01HEWNRFFYH2950D7F6YQHGDW6 presentedAt urn:uuid:1d176808-d1b3-4734-813f-603bdf85f0a7.
- 01HEWNRFFYH2950D7F6YQHGDW6 volume "2918".
- 01HEWNRFFYH2950D7F6YQHGDW6 abstract "The building stock in Europe is outdated, resulting in limited energy performances and significant primary energy consumption. Improving this energy performance will require a full commitment to energy (façade) renovations of existing buildings and is essential to meet the European climate goals. ETICS (External Thermal Insulation Composite Systems) are widely used for energy façade renovations due to their easy application and low installation costs. In addition, life cycle assessments show that this system has a low environmental impact at production phase, but in terms of circularity it does not score well. As a result of its glued connections, it is impossible to disassemble this system and reuse materials. In contrast, circular façade renovation systems facilitate reuse of materials by utilizing them in a dynamic and dismountable way. In this research, the environmental impact of three different circular façade renovation systems and ETICS will be analyzed and compared for two scenarios, by means of life cycle assessment. In the first scenario, the façade renovation system is mounted upon a case study building (with a repetitive façade pattern) for a period of 60 years and disassembled afterwards. In the second scenario, the system is disassembled from the first building after 30 years and mounted on a different, but similar building in shape and size, for a remaining period of 30 years. In the first scenario, the ETICS performs relatively well, with a limited environmental impact. However, in the second scenario, the ETICS reaches a very high environmental impact as a result of its inability for reuse. The circular façade renovation systems generally invest more in dismountable joints which create a higher environmental impact at production phase (module A), but result in a limited environmental impact after relocating the system. Reuse of building materials can ensure a significant reduction in environmental impact: compared to ETICS the circular systems are able to reduce the environmental impact from 7 to 57%.".
- 01HEWNRFFYH2950D7F6YQHGDW6 author 99C259AE-1E7E-11E4-B0FC-3B54B5D1D7B1.
- 01HEWNRFFYH2950D7F6YQHGDW6 author BE1184F6-79FD-11E6-A1F1-3577B5D1D7B1.
- 01HEWNRFFYH2950D7F6YQHGDW6 author DE41CD82-4620-11E6-9806-F7CDB4D1D7B1.
- 01HEWNRFFYH2950D7F6YQHGDW6 author F7B24E40-F0ED-11E1-A9DE-61C894A0A6B4.
- 01HEWNRFFYH2950D7F6YQHGDW6 author F822C864-F0ED-11E1-A9DE-61C894A0A6B4.
- 01HEWNRFFYH2950D7F6YQHGDW6 dateCreated "2023-11-10T13:11:52Z".
- 01HEWNRFFYH2950D7F6YQHGDW6 dateModified "2024-11-27T23:31:19Z".
- 01HEWNRFFYH2950D7F6YQHGDW6 name "Comparing the environmental impact of circular and non-circular façade renovation systems through scenario analysis".
- 01HEWNRFFYH2950D7F6YQHGDW6 pagination urn:uuid:f5104312-c2d6-48f3-a851-dcbc5406d87b.
- 01HEWNRFFYH2950D7F6YQHGDW6 publisher urn:uuid:d31c0b69-83fd-452a-9d70-2bb6fdb059aa.
- 01HEWNRFFYH2950D7F6YQHGDW6 sameAs LU-01HEWNRFFYH2950D7F6YQHGDW6.
- 01HEWNRFFYH2950D7F6YQHGDW6 sourceOrganization urn:uuid:c9c4105a-20d4-424a-b2df-8190f08f7bf2.
- 01HEWNRFFYH2950D7F6YQHGDW6 type C1.