Matches in Ghent University Academic Bibliography for { <https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/01HGAYXCD0XZ3FB06FQHX0FJQS> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 20 of
20
with 100 items per page.
- 01HGAYXCD0XZ3FB06FQHX0FJQS classification C3.
- 01HGAYXCD0XZ3FB06FQHX0FJQS date "2023".
- 01HGAYXCD0XZ3FB06FQHX0FJQS language "eng".
- 01HGAYXCD0XZ3FB06FQHX0FJQS type conference.
- 01HGAYXCD0XZ3FB06FQHX0FJQS hasPart 01HGB01B0G7T662G4EZK0J7C0Y.docx.
- 01HGAYXCD0XZ3FB06FQHX0FJQS subject "Social Sciences".
- 01HGAYXCD0XZ3FB06FQHX0FJQS presentedAt urn:uuid:7d16d273-5ee1-4593-a481-55ffd6e14835.
- 01HGAYXCD0XZ3FB06FQHX0FJQS abstract "‘Outreach’ or ‘real-life context work’? Four profiles of working in the real-life context of people. Introduction. Although ‘outreach’ is a central element of deinstitutionalization and an important methodology in the field of social and medical services, the concept itself lacks clarity. Neither a common definition that can be used across sectors and target groups, nor a typology of different types of entering the real-life context of people is available. On a research level, comparative research on the effectiveness of different types is hampered. On a policy level there is a dearth of tools to decide which type of ‘outreach’ supports which objective. In daily practice this gap creates confusion in use of terminology and difficulties in delineation of tasks and responsibilities. Methods. An online survey on ‘real-life context work’ was set up in the fields of mental health, social work, nursery, youthwork, orthopedagogics, forensic work, … in Flanders (Belgium), focusing on the objectives and characteristics of the different practices (n=902). A Latent Class Analysis (LCA) was used to determine profiles of real-life context work. Results. The LCA resulted in a typology of 4 classes of ‘real-life context’ work. The first class ‘outreach’ (32%) shows high scores on working in public space, casefinding, participating in the daily life of clients and realizing fundamental rights. The second class ‘family work’ (25%) is mainly characterized by working with families, home visits and a focus on the development of the child, safety in the family and broadening the clients network. The third class ‘mobile work’ (22%) is characterized by working with individuals who are mainly professional referred, making home visits and has as main objective supporting independence and quality of life. The fourth class (20%) ‘inreach’ shows high scores on working in other organizations, working with individuals, self-referral and with a focus on social reintegration, employment and (mental) health. Conclusion. The findings of this study illustrate the existence of different profiles of ‘real-life context work’. Insight into the four distinct classes of ‘real-life context work’ will provide a base for comparative research, qualitative ‘outreach’ policy making and conceptual clarity for field workers.".
- 01HGAYXCD0XZ3FB06FQHX0FJQS author F54CA9CA-F0ED-11E1-A9DE-61C894A0A6B4.
- 01HGAYXCD0XZ3FB06FQHX0FJQS author FA1C7372-F0ED-11E1-A9DE-61C894A0A6B4.
- 01HGAYXCD0XZ3FB06FQHX0FJQS author f436130f-c5e0-11ed-8e70-ecef5f6b4052.
- 01HGAYXCD0XZ3FB06FQHX0FJQS author urn:uuid:33722122-bc81-4d81-97a9-c72affc99538.
- 01HGAYXCD0XZ3FB06FQHX0FJQS author urn:uuid:911a0ec8-5294-46a1-80cf-581a4e95dd04.
- 01HGAYXCD0XZ3FB06FQHX0FJQS dateCreated "2023-11-28T12:36:53Z".
- 01HGAYXCD0XZ3FB06FQHX0FJQS dateModified "2024-07-09T15:33:32Z".
- 01HGAYXCD0XZ3FB06FQHX0FJQS name "‘Outreach’ or ‘real-life context work’? Four profiles of working in the real-life context of people".
- 01HGAYXCD0XZ3FB06FQHX0FJQS pagination urn:uuid:232ff52b-06de-4937-a8a8-2af7446d2bec.
- 01HGAYXCD0XZ3FB06FQHX0FJQS sameAs LU-01HGAYXCD0XZ3FB06FQHX0FJQS.
- 01HGAYXCD0XZ3FB06FQHX0FJQS sourceOrganization urn:uuid:4c988563-ee0b-44e4-87d7-d8330ae5d832.
- 01HGAYXCD0XZ3FB06FQHX0FJQS type C3.