Matches in Ghent University Academic Bibliography for { <https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/01J8S6JH53KBGWR7RMJZBGMWEP> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 23 of
23
with 100 items per page.
- 01J8S6JH53KBGWR7RMJZBGMWEP classification A1.
- 01J8S6JH53KBGWR7RMJZBGMWEP date "2024".
- 01J8S6JH53KBGWR7RMJZBGMWEP language "eng".
- 01J8S6JH53KBGWR7RMJZBGMWEP type journalArticle.
- 01J8S6JH53KBGWR7RMJZBGMWEP hasPart 01J8S76XTZZ3521DSMQA1YWT9K.pdf.
- 01J8S6JH53KBGWR7RMJZBGMWEP subject "Social Sciences".
- 01J8S6JH53KBGWR7RMJZBGMWEP doi "10.1111/bjso.12667".
- 01J8S6JH53KBGWR7RMJZBGMWEP issn "0144-6665".
- 01J8S6JH53KBGWR7RMJZBGMWEP issn "2044-8309".
- 01J8S6JH53KBGWR7RMJZBGMWEP issue "1".
- 01J8S6JH53KBGWR7RMJZBGMWEP volume "63".
- 01J8S6JH53KBGWR7RMJZBGMWEP abstract "Do White Americans prefer society to be 'colour-blind' by rising above racial identities, or 'multicultural' by openly discussing and considering them? We developed an ideology-rationality model to understand support for these diversity perspectives. Specifically, since people endorse a diversity perspective in line with their ideological values, we hypothesized that conservatism is related to a relative preference for colour blindness over multiculturalism. However, since colour blindness and multiculturalism are complex and multi-layered ideologies, we further hypothesized that the relationship between conservatism and a preference for colour blindness over multiculturalism is especially pronounced under higher levels of rationality. Results confirmed the hypotheses, either when rationality was operationalized within a dual process theory (Study 1, N = 496) or experimentally induced within a tripartite model of cognition (Study 2, N = 497). Higher levels of rationality guided White Americans high in conservatism towards a stronger preference for colour-blindness, but those low in conservatism towards a stronger preference for multiculturalism. These results suggest that among White Americans the endorsement of colour blindness versus multiculturalism stems from the interplay between ideological orientation and rationality and that rational considerations about racial policies may further divide rather than unify along ideological lines.".
- 01J8S6JH53KBGWR7RMJZBGMWEP author 1D03E564-F0EE-11E1-A9DE-61C894A0A6B4.
- 01J8S6JH53KBGWR7RMJZBGMWEP author F6EB5114-F0ED-11E1-A9DE-61C894A0A6B4.
- 01J8S6JH53KBGWR7RMJZBGMWEP author urn:uuid:0568a5d3-9f2b-4011-99d0-72689f1d83b7.
- 01J8S6JH53KBGWR7RMJZBGMWEP author urn:uuid:65249842-7f68-47e9-8bc6-88616d668e64.
- 01J8S6JH53KBGWR7RMJZBGMWEP dateCreated "2024-09-27T07:36:52Z".
- 01J8S6JH53KBGWR7RMJZBGMWEP dateModified "2024-12-12T21:02:34Z".
- 01J8S6JH53KBGWR7RMJZBGMWEP name "Rationally blind? Rationality polarizes policy support for colour blindness versus multiculturalism".
- 01J8S6JH53KBGWR7RMJZBGMWEP pagination urn:uuid:4a43caaa-ab72-454e-a2f8-3cfaf8a3dcfb.
- 01J8S6JH53KBGWR7RMJZBGMWEP sameAs LU-01J8S6JH53KBGWR7RMJZBGMWEP.
- 01J8S6JH53KBGWR7RMJZBGMWEP sourceOrganization urn:uuid:2373faaa-0291-4b8f-b92c-422d5724be5e.
- 01J8S6JH53KBGWR7RMJZBGMWEP type A1.