Matches in UGent Biblio for { <https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/1019966#aggregation> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 32 of
32
with 100 items per page.
- aggregation classification "P1".
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation date "2010".
- aggregation format "application/pdf".
- aggregation hasFormat 1019966.bibtex.
- aggregation hasFormat 1019966.csv.
- aggregation hasFormat 1019966.dc.
- aggregation hasFormat 1019966.didl.
- aggregation hasFormat 1019966.doc.
- aggregation hasFormat 1019966.json.
- aggregation hasFormat 1019966.mets.
- aggregation hasFormat 1019966.mods.
- aggregation hasFormat 1019966.rdf.
- aggregation hasFormat 1019966.ris.
- aggregation hasFormat 1019966.txt.
- aggregation hasFormat 1019966.xls.
- aggregation hasFormat 1019966.yaml.
- aggregation isPartOf urn:isbn:9789027255426.
- aggregation language "eng".
- aggregation publisher "John Benjamins".
- aggregation rights "I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher".
- aggregation subject "Languages and Literatures".
- aggregation title "Continuity is change: the long tail of Jespersen's cycle in Flemish".
- aggregation abstract "All West Germanic languages have completed Jespersen's Cycle, replacing a preverbal negation marker (stage I) with a post-verbal one (stage III) after a period of transition during which the two could co-occur (stage II). Only the Flemish dialects have maintained the old preverbal marker to some extent. The present chapter addresses this apparent historical continuity, establishing that Flemish en was in fact saved from the fate of its West Germanic cognates by a morphosyntactic change. Based on an analysis of the contexts in which preverbal en is found in present-day Flemish dialects, it is argued that en has evolved into a marker of emphasis of polarity, and that contrary to appearances, the Flemish dialects have in fact reached stage III.".
- aggregation authorList BK103664.
- aggregation endPage "76".
- aggregation startPage "61".
- aggregation volume "159".
- aggregation aggregates 1019989.
- aggregation isDescribedBy 1019966.
- aggregation similarTo LU-1019966.